AMPHAR

I think the Bengals move slow. I believe they were proven correct in some of those 31-1 votes as well. Pod Cast need content. That's it. Rookies have held out of ACTUAL TRAINING camp practices under the rookie slot system. They don't happen often and don't last long. Thus aren't very memorable. As a whole TC isn't as important as it was either contributing to that. There's been plenty of rookies miss May practices due to a graduation rule. Its just something not to worry about until July but you aren't going to get clicks, views stating that.

Could be. BJ Hill has logged over 700 snaps the past 3 seasons. One season was over 800. There wasn't much a rotation under Lou. So eventually those amount of snap counts could catch up to him AND I think you get the best out of Hill with him playing under 500/600 snaps. That's kinda the issue with Trey. Sure any of these guys can pull a Whitworth. They also could decline fast like Geno or Hubbard. It would be wise to get Trey off the field slightly more to try to limit his run defense snaps. There's some comments from Al about wanting to do a better job defending the run with 6 man boxes. Is that 4 run focused DL 2 LBs? or 3 run stuff DL, 3 LBs?

I'd go with Lap but would do his a special induction by himself. Then go with 2 other players. But if limited to 2, Parrish has always been identified as the better CB by Bengal historians and then I'd go with Lap.

Didn't miss anything. This kinda proves the point. You are hung up on the Brown family bank account and not actually looking at the roster. There are several non biased sources that have this team among the best for this season. Which I think is what you are trying to debate. Seems like your kinda a mad about it.

If your realist opinions are worth shit then you could earn your fortune off your own merit instead of gold digging. Your opinions are probably not worth a shit and your probably not good looking enough to marry money. I guess your fucked?

Bengals have a pretty good roster. Bengal Nation has a lot of fans on message boards that love to live in the 90s. Bengals are 6th Vegas odds to win Superbowl currently. 4th to win the AFC. The only thing that means is objective people have placed odds/probability based on the way this team looks on paper and its favorable. Not sure what to tell fans that insist on being "realist", lol. I guess go bet the opposite and be rich. That's the beauty of sports betting you can cash in on all those realist opinions.

Not worried about Trey until game week 1. Its just posturing. He knows he's got the current contract in his pocket. He knows what the Bengals are offering. Knows what teams were willing to pay in a trade. These are just games you play to move the Bengals offer closer to the potential trading teams. That's my take. I think he showed his hand mentioning incentives. Unless Bengals threaten to pull an offer. There's not much incentive right now for Trey to move. Probably won't be all summer.

Hendrickson in street clothes at voluntary practice. Something going on, I guess.

I'll start to worry about Trey when they get to Week 1 prep week and he isn't here. A hold out does him nothing. He knows what teams were willing to offer. He knows what Bengals have on table. Crying to media and a holdout is unlikely to change either number upward and it could only go down. So is he stupid enough to miss game checks to gain nothing?

The big concern with the draft I have is 10 DL went off the board after they took a LB with 49 and before they were up again. I like what I've read about the LB. But even if they nailed the pick and a few of those 10 DL become impact players that might be a miss. They probably aren't resigning a 29 year LB to a top of market deal. Then they doubled down on another dime a dozen position at G. Another 6 DL went off the board between that pick and 4th. Again Fairchild becomes All World, are the Bengals signing him to a top of market deal when Mims is due as well? Don't know. We'll see but this was supposed to be DL loaded draft. Would have really like to have seen 2 DL in the top 4. Hope it doesn't prove out to be a miss taking positions that are typically considered dime a dozen.

Media got burnt hyping the Bengals pre-2024 and them not making the playoffs. Bengals aren't going to get objective "hot takes". The reality is this team was hyped as good going into 2024. Lost 4 games by 1 score or less (?) to teams that were in the division round/Conference, or Superbowl. Then finished 5-0. I like what I've read about the draft class. I didn't grade it high because its not what I wanted to see pre-draft. I think Golden is going to improve the defense and think the Bengals are sitting on one of the best rosters in the league. Meanwhile in Rapien World they've wanted to add 5-7 new starters from Free Agency to be happy. There's a lot of clown media that would be clapping like sheep IF they took the coveted "guard" round 1. Same people that threw out As when Billy Price was taken with Lamar Jackson was on the board and all they had was Andy. Nobody knows but anytime the Bengals get praise, don't meet those expectations people aren't going to rush out on a limb following that to praise them. They'll go with the crowd for the most part.

My guess is they are attempting to trade Pratt but will dump him soon. He's not at voluntaries, I doubt he's apart of TC.

Sorry to see him go. He was a time bomb with DK and a questionable QB situation getting close to contract time.

Might as well get this started now: Hopefully the biggest TC watch will only be Right Guard and Secondary. Hopefully no surprise stories. With that said: Lucas Patrick opened up as the starter for RG at voluntaries.

IF I read the Texas Aggie stats correctly the DL leader in sacks the past 3 years has been 3 sacks (team leader as well) , 6 sacks, and 5 sacks (team leader as well). I don't know if its all the same coordinator or not but its clear that getting sacks from the DL wasn't a priority.