Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 i think with all the drops that peter now has a spot for sure. Quote
Bobcat Bengal Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 I'm sorry.I like Warrick, I really do.I have about 3 jerseys of his.But, Coach Lewis obviously is adamant about his 'no practice, no play' rule.I saw a couple of shots of Warrick sitting on the sideline, looking simultaneously anxious and antsy.If he can't practice during the week, he won't get in.If he can't get in, he won't become trade bait.If he can't play, he'll get cut.It sucks, but I'm reluctantly agreeing with those who said that he would get cut or would not last this season. Quote
Spain Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 How can you guys, keep this up up! Chop, cut, off with his head, yesterdays news, ciao, how fo you want me to say it he is gone! Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 i just think that he was looking good at the beginning of last year then he got hurt, why do you cut him. when he is heathly he is awesome. Quote
Spain Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 Well because his contracts up , he is not healthy and he has been a bust since we drafted him! Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 I THINK IT WILL BE THE DUMBEST THING THEY HAVE DONE SINCE DRAFTING KIJANA CARTER.AND AKILI SMITH. TJ IS NOT A NUMBER TWO AND WARRICK CAN AT LEAST HELP HENRY THIS YEAR. Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 thanks for you input spain. any one else have an opinion? Quote
derekshank Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 Yes... lots of people have opinions. Go look them up. They are scattered all over this board in a overly-generous number of threads. Also... DPM doesn't like Rudi Johnson, and HairOnFire does, just in case you were thinking of starting that thread too. Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 man that was uncalled for. why are you so hostile? Quote
Spain Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 Does the obvious escape you, he is not in are longterm plans. Hell the guy might never play again! Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 what are the bengals long term plans??? i know you dont know. its obvious Quote
derekshank Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 man that was uncalled for. why are you so hostile? I don't think hostile would be a good word to describe the post I made. Perhaps you are a bit sensitive. I was making a little joke.My only point is that this has been discussed into the ground, and it eludes me why anyone would create another thread on a topic while having no new relevant information to share. Why would anyone's opinion have changed? I think this is why you are seeing so few responses. No one has anything new to say. If you are interested in the opinions of people other than Spain, it is easy enough to find them in the variety of "Warrick" threads scattered about this forum from the last couple of weeks. Quote
Bwestbrook36 Posted August 28, 2005 Author Report Posted August 28, 2005 fine. im just having some fun. talking to other people. you didnt have to reply if its old news for you. Quote
Stripes Posted August 28, 2005 Report Posted August 28, 2005 Can't we all just get along? I don't think the poor wideout play "ensures" a spot for Warrick, but it does work in his favor. That said, with his lack of playing time, Kevin Walter/Chris Henry's success, Cliff Russell getting the nod at kick returner, and Washington's strong camp, I don't think Warrick will be around much longer. We've run out of room for him, and I think he knows it too. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.