Whur CHad At? Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 I know that it isn't excactly that important of an area right now, but it is rather intresting. It is such an intense battle between these two guys and I love them both. They both could make very good QB's in the future. The cut downs should be made next week...you pick the 3rd QB. Quote
UK Bengal Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 bramlett the reason krenzel was out there more tonight more was the coaches were not convinced on him Quote
tigerclaw Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 krenzel is a much better qb than bramlet, he showed that last night Quote
MARVIN=W'S Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 Bramlet- he knows the system and can scramble out of the pocket and make things happen, a quality you need in a third string guy. I think Krenzel was out there last night to save/earn his roster spot. Didn't happen, Bramlet is the guy. By the way how sweet is it to be pondering the THIRD QB!? Remember the Paul Justin, Neil Odonnel, Scott Mitchell, Gus Frerotte days? This is how it's supposed to be- Thanks Marvin Quote
Zilla Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 Krenzel-He looked good last night, plus he has nfl experience.He will pick up the system fast. Quote
rizzy Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 I think it is going to be Krenzel. Last week Bramlet played the majority and this week it was Krenzel. I think Krenzel looked a lot better out there than Bramlet. He just made smarter decisions out there. There are still 2 games left and anything could happen, but right now I give the edge to Krenzel. Quote
AMC Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 Krenzel....for the simple fact that he is more ready to be Carsons back up when Kitna leaves... Quote
CantStop85 Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 The only knocks on Krenzel are that he didn't go to NFL Europe and he wasn't with the Bengals last season. That being said, Krenzel has much more upside than Bramlet and he should be the third string QB. I want the future backup to Palmer to at least have a little NFL experience. Quote
bosshogg Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 ain't gonna matter they both suck. Quote
schweinhart Posted August 20, 2005 Report Posted August 20, 2005 Krenzel.I was high on Bramlett after the 1st couple NFLE games then he turned to sh*t fast, especially vs. Amsterdam.Krenzel has just got more poise.But if it's Bramlett, so be it. Anything is better than Shane Matthews. Quote
redsfan2 Posted August 21, 2005 Report Posted August 21, 2005 The only knocks on Krenzel are that he didn't go to NFL Europe and he wasn't with the Bengals last season. That being said, Krenzel has much more upside than Bramlet and he should be the third string QB. I want the future backup to Palmer to at least have a little NFL experience. What he said. Quote
Stripes Posted August 21, 2005 Report Posted August 21, 2005 I'd say Krenzel is the better choice. I hope to see neither one on the field at any time. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.