rizzy Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Update: It was false no deal at all. Stupid rumors. Quote
JungleFanatic Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 They mentioned earlier that we should know "something" by 3 o' clock this afternoon. We'll see,hopefully... :player: WHO-DEY :player: Quote
semiotter Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 i hate jim rome I second that!!!!! Quote
JungleFanatic Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Update: It was false no deal at all. Stupid rumors.Bah!! Disregard my previous post /stomps off :player: WHO-DEY :player: Quote
Bengal_Brad Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Yeah stupid rumor!! But I wonder if there is something to it. Seems like there must have been something happen to make someone jump the gun here. I bet it's done before the weekend. If not, then who knows. Quote
rizzy Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 May your balls fall off Hokie if you are messing with are demented Bengal hearts!Hey I want Pollack signed as much as you do....and I need my balls too. Looks like your balls may be falling off hokie. Quote
cincyhokie Posted August 10, 2005 Author Report Posted August 10, 2005 You would have to think that a deal is close. Both players on either side of Pollack are signed. I'm thinking he is signed by the end of the day. Quote
Kirkendall Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 untill its on the bengals.com site i am not gettin my hopes up Good idea. As for playing, Marvin has already stated he won't play Friday if he were signed today. Quote
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Per 1360 Marvin and all involved say this is false No signing. Quote
rizzy Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 The word must have got out since being a member here this is the most I have ever seen online on the board before. 58 people on right now. Hopefully something is happening with pollack right now behind the scenes there is too much talk going on for there not to be. Quote
cincyhokie Posted August 10, 2005 Author Report Posted August 10, 2005 Per 1360 Marvin and all involved say this is false No signing. That's Marvin speak for "I don't handle contracts and this is the only way I can silence these f'in reporters." Quote
DesperateDerelict Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 These are just 'contractions'. We are still in labor, and the head is nowhere in sight. We have been dilated 10.2 million forever, with no discernable progress.We need Big Orange and Hair on Fire to grab their pom-poms, get into that delivery room, and start the cheer, "Push him out, push him out, WAY out!"Needless to say, DPM is not welcome in the delivery room. Quote
TJJackson Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 from HobsonFrom: Hobson, Geoff [mailto:HobsonG@bengals.nfl.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:12 PMTo: Jackson, ThomasSubject: RE: Pollack signed per radio?I didn't hear the report. I'm not near a radio. The radio guy called me and I told him it wasn't true, so I thought the radio took back the report.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: Jackson, ThomasSent: Wed 8/10/2005 12:23 PMTo: CIN-ebagSubject: Pollack signed per radio?Acording to reports on the radio, Pollack is signed, but there is nothing on the website about this. How about putting up a short piece to either confirm or quell the rumor :-) Quote
Kazkal Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 untill its on the bengals.com site i am not gettin my hopes upGood idea. As for playing, Marvin has already stated he won't play Friday if he were signed today. well they might send him in to blitz even 3rd stringers play in preseason games Quote
Kirkendall Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 untill its on the bengals.com site i am not gettin my hopes upGood idea. As for playing, Marvin has already stated he won't play Friday if he were signed today. well they might send him in to blitz even 3rd stringers play in preseason games Marvin said he will not play against New England, signed or not. Quote
rizzy Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Dave Lapham talked to Katie Blackburn today and he is talking about it on 1360 now. He said he would not be in camp tonight but it is likley you could see him on the sidelines tomorrow night for the preseason game. The deal is very close now. Quote
gobengals19 Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Dave Lapham talked to Katie Blackburn today and he is talking about it on 1360 now. He said he would not be in camp tonight but it is likley you could see him on the sidelines tomorrow night for the preseason game. The deal is very close now. well thats better than nothing, thnx rizzy. Quote
HairOnFire Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Dave Lapham talked to Katie Blackburn today and he is talking about it on 1360 now. He said he would not be in camp tonight but it is likley you could see him on the sidelines tomorrow night for the preseason game. The deal is very close now. Great news if true. Sadly, it seems the signing will come to late to save Hokies balls. Quote
bengalindian Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Dave Lapham talked to Katie Blackburn today and he is talking about it on 1360 now. He said he would not be in camp tonight but it is likley you could see him on the sidelines tomorrow night for the preseason game. The deal is very close now.Great news if true. Sadly, it seems the signing will come to late to save Hokies balls. Where's the machete? Or, did you know that they use a very tight, strong rubber band to remove the balls of a bull? We could always resort to that. Quote
cincyhokie Posted August 10, 2005 Author Report Posted August 10, 2005 "Great news if true. Sadly, it seems the signing will come to late to save Hokies balls.""Where's the machete? Or, did you know that they use a very tight, strong rubber band to remove the balls of a bull? We could always resort to that."That's not cool. Don't shoot the messenger. I'm only 29, I need my balls fellas. Quote
DesperateDerelict Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 "Great news if true. Sadly, it seems the signing will come to late to save Hokies balls." "Where's the machete? Or, did you know that they use a very tight, strong rubber band to remove the balls of a bull? We could always resort to that."That's not cool. Don't shoot the messenger. I'm only 29, I need my balls fellas. Hokie, I find your use of the term "fellas", especially hailing from Blacksburg, VA. to be totally inappropriate.OFF WITH HIS BALLS!!! Quote
Kazkal Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 can you feel it pollack is coming wooooooooooo Quote
joshh967 Posted August 11, 2005 Report Posted August 11, 2005 what is going on....hes signed....its not a done deal...press confrences....i cant take this lol Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.