Jump to content

This year compared to last


walzav29

Recommended Posts

Minnesota, Houston, Tennessee, Green Bay, Indianapolis, Detroit and Kansas City instead of New England, Miami, Philly, Denver, Washington, Jets, and Cowboys. That is very favorable for our offense. Even though we went 4-3 with the teams listed above, it was still alot more physical than it will be this year. That means they'll be healthier and more confident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, but beating them is a lot easier on your home feild, and if you are healthy and confident. Home field advantage will give them the type of confidence they need, and baltimore and pittsburgh are hit-you-in-the-mouth type teams, so they'll know how to play agianst good teams.

I'll take a soft schedule and get home feild advantage any day. You definitely want to be able to beat the better teams in the league, but a team that went 12-4 and has home field advantage is going to have more confidence to do it, than a team that is in the middle of the season. Just my opinion, but I'll take a soft schedule over a brutal one.

However, it's hard to say anything about a soft schedule right now. It looks pretty soft, but teams that got to play San Diego last year probably thought it was an automatic win too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minnesota, Houston, Tennessee, Green Bay, Indianapolis, Detroit and Kansas City instead of New England, Miami, Philly, Denver, Washington, Jets, and Cowboys. That is very favorable for our offense. Even though we went 4-3 with the teams listed above, it was still alot more physical than it will be this year. That means they'll be healthier and more confident.

Instead of tougher defenses, we end up with stronger offenses. Frankly, this is a harder schedule in my mind because while we can put up points even against stronger defenses, we didn't do so well last season in holding people back. We let the CLOWNS score over 40 points on us! Minnesota, Indianapolis, Green Bay, Detroit, and Kansas City can ALL put up a LOT of points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not going to the superbowl until we can beat those types of teams

5 wins out of the 7 teams listed, not bad. Although the Philly game was a gimme, I thought we had New England until Carson went down. And the loss to the Jet's was Carson's first start...

A win is a win, no matter who you're playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the key is how we do in our division. Beat those guys and you would assume that, whichever of the out of division teams end up being good (which is hard to predict year-to-year now), they will do as much damage to our division foes as they will to us. It's hard to predict how good teams will be with all of the off-season movement. It may end up being a matter of when we play these teams. For example, Minn. looks to have improved a lot, but has moved in a lot of new faces. If they turn out to live up to those expectations, catching them in week 2 could be a blessing as they should still be finding out how to play their new guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the key is how we do in our division. Beat those guys and you would assume that, whichever of the out of division teams end up being good (which is hard to predict year-to-year now), they will do as much damage to our division foes as they will to us. It's hard to predict how good teams will be with all of the off-season movement. It may end up being a matter of when we play these teams. For example, Minn. looks to have improved a lot, but has moved in a lot of new faces. If they turn out to live up to those expectations, catching them in week 2 could be a blessing as they should still be finding out how to play their new guys.

Some good points. I guess one of the main things to look for are how our schedules differ. For instance, the teams we play, and they don't, and vice versa.

We Play vs. Buf and @ K.C.

Baltimore plays vs. NYJ and @ Den

Pittsburgh plays vs. N.E. and @ S.D.

Looks like Baltimore has the advantage to me, and Pitt and us are fairly even.

Also Pittsburgh has to face both Indy and Minnesota on the road, whereas we and Baltimore get them at home.

The schedule looks unfavorable to Pittsburgh. For us it depends on J.P. Losman and K.C.'s defense. Baltimore I don't know what to think about either of those teams. I don't think Denver's going to be a playoff team, but the Jets could be real good again, depending on Pennington's shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think that means we won't be tested as hard. I would rather play a tough schedule if we make the playoffs.

Oh, don't worry, we aren't catching any breaks this year...

http://www.theredzone.org/strength.asp

2005 Strength Of Schedule

Team Winning Percentage Opp. Total Wins Opp. Total Losses

1. Dolphins .547 140 116

2. Chargers .543 139 117

3. Patriots .539 138 118

4. (t) Jets .535 137 119

4. (t) Chiefs .535 137 119

5. (t) Ravens .531 136 120

5. (t) Bills .531 136 120

6. (t) Browns .527 135 121

6. (t) Raiders .527 135 121

7. (t) Broncos .523 134 122

7. (t) Bengals .523 134 122

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think that means we won't be tested as hard.  I would rather play a tough schedule if we make the playoffs.

Oh, don't worry, we aren't catching any breaks this year...

http://www.theredzone.org/strength.asp

2005 Strength Of Schedule

Team Winning Percentage Opp. Total Wins Opp. Total Losses

1. Dolphins .547 140 116

2. Chargers .543 139 117

3. Patriots .539 138 118

4. (t) Jets .535 137 119

4. (t) Chiefs .535 137 119

5. (t) Ravens .531 136 120

5. (t) Bills .531 136 120

6. (t) Browns .527 135 121

6. (t) Raiders .527 135 121

7. (t) Broncos .523 134 122

7. (t) Bengals .523 134 122

ya but can u do a graph for the records of 8 games at home vs 8 games on the road...gaurantee home is harder. our schedule is easier this year than last...whoever doesnt think so doesnt know s**t about the nfl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virtually any sked would be easier than last year, ditty; our opponents' combined winning % was something like .541, which would put us in the top 3 of the 2005 projection. And yes, it's nice to get the tougher games at home. That certainly won't hurt. But we still gotta play 'em and we still gotta win 'em and that still means we have to beat some good teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with our division playing how it is we will never have a schedule at the bottom of the league. we will always have a hard schedule u just have to look at the advantages of it. this year there are a ton of more advantages than last. which equals an easier schedule.

to go above .500 no matter who you are or what your schedule is, you will have to beat some good teams to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, like I said, it should be easier whether you consider who we play home vs. away or not.

This year's home/away lineup looks friendlier, but I don't know that I'd say it has a "ton" of advantages. We had good teams at home last year -- Baltimore, Buffalo, Pitt -- and we still lost, and we dropped "easy" games like Tennessee and Cleveland on the road. And I thought some of their best games, like second Baltimore and the Pats game (even tho we lost) came on the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like the Bengals have a bunch of trap games this year. Unlike last year when the schedule was hard and you knew it. This year the schedule seems soft but has some games that you just don't know about.

at Chicago, at Tennessee, at Detroit, Houston. With the exception of the Titans all these teams are believed to be up and comers and right there with the Bengals. And you know how Steve McNair performs against the Bengals especially in Nashville. These teams probably even expect to win those games to have successful seasons.

I hope the team pulls it off. I believe they can but these games are not to be taken lightly and none are gimmes, and the schedule is not soft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its too hard to judge a team or schedule based on last years performance. All the defenses we play this year may be much improved. Its hard to say until they actually start playing.

That being said, I think if the Bengals play defenses as good as those last year they would still do better. I see good things.

:player: :player: :player:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...