walzav29 Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 That's saying a healthy Warrick. I would say that the Bengals have more potential, but the Colts guys have more production......For now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 That's saying a healthy Warrick. I would say that the Bengals have more potential, but the Colts guys have more production......For now. I voted based on now. But...I have hope that my opinion might change by Week 9. That's enough to put a hop in my step here in mid-May. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdogbuckeye Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 I second that membengal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 You can't NOT give it to the Colts based on what we KNOW. We KNOW they scored a s**tload of points last year. We KNOW Warrick didn't play last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 I voted for the Bengals, but not based on those three names. I guess I got caught up in our depth even at 4 and 5. I think if the Colts have an injury they could be hurting at WR. The Bengals have 2 non starters that would be the #1 on many NFL teams. But I'm probably being a homer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 The Dolts receivers & Pay-ton get fat against Jax & Tennessee. In 2004 we played 9 or more games against the top 10 Defenses (really incredible, if you think about it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ickeyshuffler Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Ummm...shouldn't it matter that the Colts' guys have Peyton freaking Manning throwing to them. Carson's on the rise and all, but he's not Peyton. And if we're talking about production, what we KNOW, then surely their stats are padded somewhat by having the best quarterback we've seen in a while delivering the ball.Plus, I agree, overall the bengals are much better off:CJ, Warrick, Housh, Washington, Henry -- and even Walter can step up in a pinch. That's depth.Plus, the bengals have the best individual receiver among the group. Harrison has got to be easing toward the downswing of his career, while Chad will only get better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Hey shuffler, Walter won't make the squad this year, and we don't know what's going to happen with Warrick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefrazz Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 I think it is mostely the "Manning Factor" Harrison is great, but the other 2 are just....good?You put Manning in any other team and I bet he does the same thing.On the other end, you put Bledsoe or Vic in Indy and those guys wouldn't have the numbers they have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.