benglsdrumr Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 heyyyyyyyyyoooooo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 I don't personally think so. I think Pollack is just as good as what Boulware is now. Besides, there's really no point in bringing a guy on for one year, and the future doesn't require another rushing outside linebacker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 I see us making a run at him and I see us getting rid of Duane Clemons. Boulware would play DE. He would alternate time with Geathers. I see us doing this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Ne way, never will happpen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 I see us making a run at him and I see us getting rid of Duane Clemons. Boulware would play DE. He would alternate time with Geathers. I see us doing this No way in HELL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Why wouldn't we? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cj4mvp85 Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 i defintaly think we will try real hard to get him but i dont think we will end up having him sign a bengals contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Uh, why would you cut Warrick for him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 i defintaly think we will try real hard to get him but i dont think we will end up having him sign a bengals contract Why try real hard? He's injury prone, he is no better than the guy we just drafted at his position, and if we did as the previous poster suggested while sniffing glue, and turned him into a defensive end, he would be a mere prospect.IF he wants to come cheap and be a backup for a year or two, sure, otherwise, SEEYA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Warrick hasn't done anything spectacular folks. Boulware had 15 sacks in 01 or 02. Boulware is twenty time better than Warrick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 If he comes cheap sure why not,We don't really need him anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet23 Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Why wouldn't we? Hobson says it best. This is not a fit.Hobson's Choice: Having a fit?5/12/2005 - Do you think Marvin Lewis will pursue the recently released Peter Boulware. It seems to me that Lewis is always interested in his former players in free agency. He's coming off an injury and probably won't cost a whole lot. Also, with a deep but young linebacking crew, wouldn't it be nice to add a seasoned veterin who has the ability to play defensive end?Joe, Lexington KYJOE: I could see it happening, but not right now. Yes, this transplanted Pro Bowl sacker at outside linebacker would be the perfect mentor for an All-American defensive end. Yet Lewis is trotting out his stock no answer answer on free agency: "I will always try to see if the right party fits," Lewis told his friends at The Baltimore Sun Wednesday night. Economics, scheme, and personnel indicate it isn’t at the moment. Boulware would seem to be in line to get some good coin, or at least he thinks he is since he reportedly turned down a $2 million deal with $2 million more in incentives to stay in Baltimore this year. Like Jamie Sharper, he could get $4 million this year in salary and bonus. If the Bengals paid close to that, they’d have to cut somebody and play him regularly to justify it. Keep in mind that releasing middle linebacker Nate Webster before June 1 doesn’t save any money in a $1.5 million push. So who do you cut if you don’t jump the gun on Peter Warrick? And who do you sit? You’ve got a No. 1 pick invested in one outside backer (David Pollack) and the other outside backer is another big money guy in Brian Simmons. The next step is to make Boulware a situational pass rusher at end, but you can’t bench Robert Geathers (not a sky’s-the-limit-22-year-old) and what do you do with another big money guy in Justin Smith that did have eight sacks last season, and is a three-down guy? Plus, Boulware has had his best days in a 3-4 look, and while the Bengals are going to play some of that, the 4-3 is going to be their base defense. I’d love to have the guy. He’s a proven pass rusher with at least seven sacks in all of his seven seasons, but it just doesn’t seem like it would be a fit. Maybe if he hung around on the market, but don’t expect that with the Browns coveting him. They’ll pay him and play him in his 3-4. It’s a great ideal until you start trying to figure it out. You’d almost wish that, instead, they’d look at a proven run-stuffing tackle like Keith Traylor. But indications are they are turned off by his 36 years of age when the season starts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 No way. We don't need him. Especially for the money he would be asking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Boulware is twenty time better than Warrick.Not really.This isn't going to happen any ways so no point in arguing about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDDFC Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Uh, why would you cut Warrick for him? It's either because we have a 1 Peter rule or Boulware is now playing WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.