WhoDey93285 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 I hope we get Shazor or Brimmer, any chance they fall to us this round? Quote
thenati85 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 absolutely, I think either one will fill the bill nicely.or what about this kid from unc sensabaugh if the others are gone this kid looks interesting Quote
bengalsfan33 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 There's still a ton of nice prospects out there. Attaj Hawthorne, Brandon Browner, Ernest Shazor, and Jammal Brimmer. Quote
alleycat Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 CJ Mosley is still out there as well as Sensabaugh, Butler, and Hawthorne. I'm crushed about Brandon Jones, though. Quote
BengalPappaw Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 I'd rather have Sensabaugh than Shazor -- Sensabaugh looks more like a ML type SS Quote
alleycat Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Robert McCune is still available, too. Would be a special teams monster if nothing else. Have you seen that guy with his shirt off at the combine? Quote
bengalsfan33 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Michael Munoz is still there as well. Could we draft him to replace one of our free agent offensive linemans that will be a FA after this season>? Quote
TJJackson Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Shazor and Brimmer are too slow to play for the Bengals. Get over them, folks. I know you like them, but their lack of speed will hurt them more in NFL than it did in college.Probable targets round 5S J ButlerLB R McCuneLB A SewardS G SensabaughDE J HayeDT D MosleyTE A BergenC B Wilkerson (yes, they took a C in 4, can take Wilkerson and play one at G, one at C)Most of these guys except Bergen were projected to rounds 2-3 Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Shazor ran a 4.4 40. He just had a bad pro day. 4.7 pro day thats bad but he isnt that bad. Shazor or Hawthorne with the 5th round pick. Quote
alleycat Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Shazor ran a 4.4 40. He just had a bad pro day. 4.7 pro day thats bad but he isnt that bad. Shazor or Hawthorne with the 5th round pick. Curious. When did he run a 4.4? Just wondering where you got that figure from because it's sort of jaw dropping to me. Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 And TJ, they made a good point about people like you(guys who judge players on the 40 times) that if you do that your not judging them right. You have to judge them about their ability to play the game. SOmetime you can have the fasest guy, but they can be the worst players in the world. Shazor and Hawthorne can play. Shazor led his team in tackles. He is a pretty dang on good player. He is being compared to Brian Dawkins. Quote
BeyondTheJungle Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 There are so many "name" guys out there that a few of them are bound to still be on the board. But I'm not pinning my hopes on any one guy because I know that at this point in the draft there's a 95% chance ML takes a guy I've never heard of. Quote
TJJackson Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 ...ah, so his 4.4 speed and excellent tackling ability explain his free fall to round 5 and possibly beyond....and the fact that most people now have him listed as a LB rather than a Stell me more, tell me more.Oh, and just so you know, safeties occasionally - every now and then during the course of a game - have to run. The faster they run, the quicker they can get from where they are to where the guy with the ball is. See, all the tackling ability in the world is of no avail if you can't get to where the ball carrier is.OH, as an aside: had he actually run a 4.4, he'd have been gone no later than round 3. I know you've seen it in print some place, heck, may even have been at the nfl.com site and thereby is as official as it gets, but had he really and truly run that that, he'd already have been drafted. Quote
turnip Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Shazor and Brimmer are too slow to play for the Bengals. Get over them, folks. I know you like them, but their lack of speed will hurt them more in NFL than it did in college.Probable targets round 5S ButlerLB McCuneLB SewardS SensabaughDT MosleyTE BergenC Wilkerson (yes, they took a C in 4, can take Wilkerson and play one at G, one at C)Most of these guys except Bergen were projected like round 2-3 Another note on Wilkerson, if we were to take him, there's a possibility that we have to draft two interior linemen in hopes that at least one pans out. That said, I don't see it happening. ML wants guys who are healthy, and I am not convinced Wilkerson is.A lot of the guys you named are nice targets though, particularly Sensabaugh. I could see Brandon Browner getting drafted by us also. Quote
thenati85 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 give me S sensabaugh, you can sign any of these DL when the free agent period starts after the draft :player: :player: Quote
alleycat Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 We're on deck! should get someone we like!! Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Sensabaugh 4.55 in the 40-yard dash----too slow, we need guys with 4.1 4.2 speed according to TJ or they suck. SO apparntly our draft class this year has been bad cuz no one runs a 4.1 4.2 Quote
TJJackson Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Cincinnati ON THE CLOCK as I type. wooooOOOOO!(so of course ESPN goes to commercial so we don't get it in real time) Quote
bengalsfan33 Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 And the got on a freaking commercial.....again! Quote
alleycat Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 It's funny how they cut to the commercial whenever we're up. Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted April 24, 2005 Report Posted April 24, 2005 Thats the last 4 rounds it goes to a commercial on our pick!!!!! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.