Kirkendall Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 Pick your favorite left offensive tackle and whoever is on the list, goes on the poll. So if he's your favorite, make sure his name is on this list before the poll starts up WEDNESDAY(should we go ahead and put Munoz on the starters list and just debate the second offensive tackle?) Quote
jditty47 Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 yes. munoz. then anderson. its hands down...no need to vote on it. Quote
HoTbOy Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 yes. munoz. then anderson. its hands down...no need to vote on it. I 2nd that motion Quote
AGrizzlyBaer Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 yeah i think theres not to much debate lol Quote
TJJackson Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 oh yeah, hadda be that undrafted 255lb guy from Montana State that eventually played for the niners(j/k)(edited later: LT Kirk Scrafford. 255 pounds soaking wet. see http://www.bengals.com/team/alumni.asp?i=4&firstyear=1991) Quote
bengalboomer7 Posted March 28, 2005 Report Posted March 28, 2005 MUnoz wasn't that good. He could have never blocked for Corey Dillon. (I wonder who that sounds like!) I say we debate it........let's do it after I get my head examined though Quote
walshfan Posted March 29, 2005 Report Posted March 29, 2005 yes. munoz. then anderson. its hands down...no need to vote on it. I 2nd that motion Munoz played Lt because he could pass protect so well...Anderson plays the RT position because while he is a great run blocker he isnt very good at pass protection.. He gets beat even on the right side and the team doesnt want him on the QB's blindside.. Levi is a better LT than Anderson....quicker with his footwork and all..Best RT is Willie Anderson Lt Munoz C Bob Johnson G Montoya and Lapham. Quote
Super Cat Posted March 29, 2005 Report Posted March 29, 2005 Rufus Mayes LT, Vernon Holland Right Tackle Quote
JPW Posted March 29, 2005 Report Posted March 29, 2005 yes. munoz. then anderson. its hands down...no need to vote on it. Works for me ... Quote
TippCityRick Posted March 29, 2005 Report Posted March 29, 2005 I'm guessing that if the entire history of the NFL can't offer a better LT than 78 then why should we even try Quote
rob_justdmb Posted March 30, 2005 Report Posted March 30, 2005 Nothing I can add to this post. Which really makes me ask myself, "Why am I even posting?" Because I'm member # 13 and I'm still a rookie. I need to garner some more experience. Maybe Coach will put me in. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.