ArmyBengal Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Saw where the Chargers used the "Exclusive Franchise Tag" on Drew Brees, which gives him the opportunity to still talk to other teams. What the hell is this?? If this is suppose to give a warm and fuzzy to the player to allow them to see their open market value, would this not have been a good option for our "Rudi" situation or do I just not know what the hell I'm talking about ?? I for one, would be curious what Rudi would have gotten as far as offers are concerned as $6.3 seems way high in my opinion. Just curious as I've never heard of this.WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 It's like double-secret probation, I guess. Seriously, I think they have to be signed before they can be traded. So maybe they are allowing their agent to shop him around or something. I did find this article about Brees, though.http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/8195015/1Chargers to use franchise tag once or twice to keep Brees Feb. 14, 2005By Clark JudgeSportsLine.com Senior Writer The San Diego Chargers haven't made an announcement, but they've made a decision -- and they're expected to declare later this week that they will protect quarterback Drew Brees for another year by making him the team's franchise player. OK, so you expected it. So did I. But the presence of quarterback Philip Rivers, acquired with last year's first-round draft pick, and the team's continued support for him at least cast suspicion over the Chargers' allegiance to Brees. Until now. The club will do the right thing with Brees, which is to keep him off the free-agent market and review its options -- including trading the 26-year-old quarterback for a first-round draft choice. But league sources insist that San Diego general manager A.J. Smith has no intention of turning loose Brees, whose contract expires in March, and that the Chargers will keep him another season, evaluate his performance, then address his future this time next year. If Brees plays as he did in 2004 when he led the club to the AFC West title, threw a career-high 27 touchdown passes, had the NFL's third-highest passer rating and reached his first Pro Bowl, the Chargers are expected to move to re-sign him. Only here's where you might be surprised. NFL sources indicated that Smith, who should be the league's executive of the year for turning a perennial doormat into a division champion, isn't averse to making Brees a franchise player a second straight year -- much as Seattle did with tackle Walter Jones and St. Louis did with tackle Orlando Pace. And don't ask me how that goes over with Brees. He already is on record as saying he wants a multiyear deal, and he might insist on one this year after the Chargers make their announcement. But it's not going to happen, largely because the Chargers want to see what they have in Brees -- who produced three ordinary years and one memorable one with the club -- and don't want to move on without Rivers. The popular belief was that if Brees were to replicate last season, that multi-year deal was a cinch for 2006. But those who know Smith know how much he and the club value Rivers, and they said Smith might be reluctant to make a long-term commitment to Brees because of his commitment to Rivers. From the Chargers' perspective that would be six years, the length of the deal Rivers signed last summer. But Smith's commitment to Rivers transcends contractual terms. Since acquiring the former North Carolina State quarterback, Smith has seen nothing to convince him that Rivers cannot and will not be a franchise quarterback. So conventional wisdom says you don't tie up megabucks in one position in today's NFL; but since when did conventional wisdom handcuff Smith? He's the guy who had the guts to cut his losses with wide receiver David Boston and defensive end Marcellus Wiley. He had the foresight to draft a punter when Pro Bowler Darren Bennett was on the roster. He swung the deal for AWOL wide receiver Keenan McCardell. And he drafted Eli Manning after Manning warned that he wouldn't go to San Diego. "All I care about is winning," Smith once said. "It's all about winning and moving forward and doing what it takes." Well, then, stay tuned because the Chargers are about to tie up serious money -- including $8 million against the salary cap for Brees -- in the quarterback position for at least the next year. They have $21 million in cap space to do it, and thank Smith for that. He made the moves that make franchising Brees possible. He prepared for that possibility over a year ago. Knowing Smith, he's also preparing for what happens if and when Brees pulls an encore in 2005. Those close to him say he's ruled nothing out, except, of course, trading Rivers. When I addressed the subject with him after the season, Smith made it clear where he stood. "The chances of that happening," he said, "are zero. None." The chances of a quarterback dilemma, however, are much better than that -- and, in this case, that is good. The Chargers are doing what they should do with Drew Brees, which is to retain him. The rest is up to Smith, and, after what happened last year, it's safe to say that San Diego fans can ... and should ... trust him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Basically, ot means they are content to keep him for 05, but probably no longer than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Saw where the Chargers used the "Exclusive Franchise Tag" on Drew Brees, which gives him the opportunity to still talk to other teams. What the hell is this?? If this is suppose to give a warm and fuzzy to the player to allow them to see their open market value, would this not have been a good option for our "Rudi" situation or do I just not know what the hell I'm talking about ?? Brees was tagged with the regular ("non-exclusive") franchise tag.http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=char...ov=st&type=lgnsThe difference between the two (only to plug the apparently under-read Bengals Banter column here at Bengalszone ) from: http://www.bengalszone.com/article.php?sid=243The (regular franchise tag) requires the team tender an offer equal to the top 5 salaries at the position in 2004, and still permits the player to negotiate with other teams. The exclusive franchise tag, however, requires a tender equal to the top five salaries at the position as of April 15, 2005, and prohibits the player from talking to other teams at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 The difference between the two (only to plug the apparently under-read Bengals Banter column here at Bengalszone ) from: http://www.bengalszone.com/article.php?sid=243The (regular franchise tag) requires the team tender an offer equal to the top 5 salaries at the position in 2004, and still permits the player to negotiate with other teams. The exclusive franchise tag, however, requires a tender equal to the top five salaries at the position as of April 15, 2005, and prohibits the player from talking to other teams at all. Nothing but a shameless plug...... Thanks for clearing it up for us Joisey! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.