BengalNation1281 Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 It looks like Billick will have to find a whole new crop of disgraced college coaches to interview for the vacated D-Coordinator position. Is Gary Barnett available?BN1281 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPW Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 It looks like Billick will have to find a whole new crop of disgraced college coaches to interview for the vacated D-Coordinator position. Is Gary Barnett available?BN1281Yea well I Hope that Billick does look for someone new.That way maybe he would let the Bengals hire Rex Ryan as their new DC... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 Damn, they didn't give Erickson any kind of chance did they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jditty47 Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 should they have? erickson is terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 With the players and injuries Erickson had, Lombardi himself couldn't have won with that team! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABengalsFan09 Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 Hopefully Nolan takes Ed Red with him!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 espn thinks Rex Ryan will get the job. Makes sense, esp. if the rumor about them denying permission to Ryan to talk to Marvin about the DC job in Cincy are true.http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1968889I'm more concerned about Fassel getting the OC gig. Fassel calls good plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 should they have? erickson is terrible.If he was so terrible, why did they hire him on in the first place?Just because San Fran had a losing season doesn't mean its a bad team, or unattractive to prospects, ala Cincy Pre-Marvin.Who wouldn't want to coach for a storied franchise like San Fran?They could've had their pick of any coach, you act like they just threw some names in a hat and picked one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jditty47 Posted January 18, 2005 Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 erickson wasnt first choice or even third choice. he has never turned a franchise around in the nfl and with him under the helm it will only get worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.