JBrooks Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 USC showed how damn good they are, but it's still not fair Auburn didn't get a title share or a shot at the title game.They're definitely better than Oklahoma and USC probably would have beaten them......but nobody gave THE Ohio State University a snowball's chance in hell against Miami a couple years ago. Look how that turned out.USC got their share last year, it's a huge stinking load that Auburn did not get the same respect this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABengalsFan09 Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 USC got a share last year because they were #1 in both human polls and still got overlooked for the title game. This year Auburn was #3 in both....I understand where you're coming from but there was more of a discrepancy in '03. i would have loved to see Auburn vs. USC, since USC smoked them the last 2 times they played them in the previous 2 seasons.... And I dont' want to hear that Auburn wasn't as good in '03 as they were in in '04, because when USC smoked Auburn @ Auburn 23-0, Matt Leinart was making his first collegiate start. He is also much better now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Hey, LA, you got any Matt Leinart news for us, i haven't heard either way yet and I thought he was going to announce today! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted January 13, 2005 Report Share Posted January 13, 2005 Posted on the wrong thread, nevermind, it looks like he''ll wait till tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.