HoosierCat Posted August 5, 2004 Report Posted August 5, 2004 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingCamp...john&id=1852472Sheesh, talk about a big, wet, sloppy one. Could Clayton have sucked up to Carson any more? He clearly thinks he's the real deal, tho.His 5 observations are up, too. Nothing earth-shattering (Chad rocks, O'Neal is a question, there are issues at DT and with o-line depth) but he does like Webster. Quote
skyline Posted August 5, 2004 Report Posted August 5, 2004 Yeah, I was interested in his Nate Webster comments... Quote
Kirkendall Posted August 5, 2004 Report Posted August 5, 2004 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingCamp...john&id=1852472Sheesh, talk about a big, wet, sloppy one. Could Clayton have sucked up to Carson any more? He clearly thinks he's the real deal, tho.His 5 observations are up, too. Nothing earth-shattering (Chad rocks, O'Neal is a question, there are issues at DT and with o-line depth) but he does like Webster. Does anyone wonder how John Clayton is a senior writer for the NFL? The dude defines what a nerd is, he looks it, acts it, and talks like it... he's a little twirp.. I do like his reports though, so he's not all that bad. Quote
CTBengalsFan Posted August 5, 2004 Report Posted August 5, 2004 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingCamp...john&id=1852472Sheesh, talk about a big, wet, sloppy one. Could Clayton have sucked up to Carson any more? He clearly thinks he's the real deal, tho.His 5 observations are up, too. Nothing earth-shattering (Chad rocks, O'Neal is a question, there are issues at DT and with o-line depth) but he does like Webster.Does anyone wonder how John Clayton is a senior writer for the NFL? The dude defines what a nerd is, he looks it, acts it, and talks like it... he's a little twirp.. I do like his reports though, so he's not all that bad. i've always thought the same thing Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.