Kazkal Posted July 8, 2010 Report Posted July 8, 2010 Well Lebron isn't official yet but are teams going to be able compete against this them?Kinda scary but then again all that star power could be a downfall...yaa right o_O Quote
ArmyBengal Posted July 15, 2010 Report Posted July 15, 2010 I'm not a true basketball fan, but I would think the Lakers will still be the team to beat.I fully expect the Heat to be there in the end, but it's not a given. Quote
BengalPimp Posted July 15, 2010 Report Posted July 15, 2010 I don't see Miami winning it this year. They still have too many spots to fill on the roster, and no money left. Their bench will obviously be weak, so the starters will probably log around 40+ minutes a game. They need another year to fill in some still missing pieces, and the best, and even mediocre in this free-agent class have already agreed/signed, so maybe they pick up some decent depth next year.So far the Heat roster look like thisPG Mario ChalmersSG Dwayne WadeSF LeBron JamesPF Chris BoshC Udonis HaslemI believe the only 5 that are under contract right now. Mike Miller apparently agreed to terms, but has yet to sign. Then, their looking to add 4 Rookies: F Da'Sean Butler, G/F Yakhouba Diawara, C Dexter Pittman, F Jarvis Varnado. That would still only make 10 players (if Miller signs) and by NBA rules you need to have 13 players under contract. Their money is all spent, and they need to sign the rookie 2nd rd picks and still 3 more to fill their roster.Lakers are still the team to beat, and actually got a little stronger with the signing of PG Steve Blake. I personally think he is a perfect fit for this team, and should be the starter over Derek Fisher. Blake is a much better passer and 3 point shooter than Fisher, and he actually brings the ball up the court (which Fisher rarely does anymore). But Fisher is a quality back-up.So, Lakers again this year (3 peat) Phil Jackson will retire, and then maybe Miami gets 2 or 3 rings...max. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted July 16, 2010 Report Posted July 16, 2010 I think the Heat also got Ilguskas (sorry for the spelling) to add to the bench as well. It appears they are aware of their lack of depth, but while I still think they will be there throughout, I agree with the Lakers still being tops until proven otherwise. Quote
Stripes Posted July 16, 2010 Report Posted July 16, 2010 I'm more than hesitant to consider the Heat immediate title contenders as well. As you guys have covered, they'll struggle to build any remotely respectable depth. Also, the three mega-talents they've brought together don't look like they'll be able to compete in such diverse areas of the court as the Boston big three have. They lack a consistent perimeter shooter, and none of those three are terribly impressive in off-ball defense.They ought to win often and make the playoffs as a top four or so seed in the East, but I'll be surprised if they tear the league apart early or often. Quote
cincy9275 Posted July 18, 2010 Report Posted July 18, 2010 still think the lakers and boston are the teams to beat. right now the heat have no bench what so ever. that will kill them come playoff time. then can the heat keep the ego's in check? only time will tell. the heat pissed a lot of people off with this so called super team. the heat are going to be a marked team. there going to get every one's best shot on a nightly basis. then if the heat fail and get knocked out of the playoff's by a lesser team. watch out this could get very ugly. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted July 18, 2010 Report Posted July 18, 2010 I agree that it's all about getting depth and production off the bench for the Heat. I remember when the Celtics and Magic were heading into their playoff series this past season and telling my buddy (a Magic fan) that the Magic wouldn't be able to beat the Celtics because the Magic simply had nothing after their starters. Then when it was said and done, the Magic failed miserably. Although I think the Heat will in the playoffs the end of the season, they need to continue working that bench. Quote
BlainThePain Posted August 3, 2010 Report Posted August 3, 2010 I don't see Miami winning it this year. They still have too many spots to fill on the roster, and no money left. Their bench will obviously be weak, so the starters will probably log around 40+ minutes a game. They need another year to fill in some still missing pieces, and the best, and even mediocre in this free-agent class have already agreed/signed, so maybe they pick up some decent depth next year.So far the Heat roster look like thisPG Mario ChalmersSG Dwayne WadeSF LeBron JamesPF Chris BoshC Udonis HaslemI believe the only 5 that are under contract right now. Mike Miller apparently agreed to terms, but has yet to sign. Then, their looking to add 4 Rookies: F Da'Sean Butler, G/F Yakhouba Diawara, C Dexter Pittman, F Jarvis Varnado. That would still only make 10 players (if Miller signs) and by NBA rules you need to have 13 players under contract. Their money is all spent, and they need to sign the rookie 2nd rd picks and still 3 more to fill their roster.Lakers are still the team to beat, and actually got a little stronger with the signing of PG Steve Blake. I personally think he is a perfect fit for this team, and should be the starter over Derek Fisher. Blake is a much better passer and 3 point shooter than Fisher, and he actually brings the ball up the court (which Fisher rarely does anymore). But Fisher is a quality back-up.So, Lakers again this year (3 peat) Phil Jackson will retire, and then maybe Miami gets 2 or 3 rings...max.I think Jarvis Varnado is going to really surprise some people this year. If not this upcoming season, then in the next couple of season. He gave Kentucky more fits than any other player in the SEC. Also, I think Orlando will win the East next season. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.