skyline Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4874353Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGrizzlyBaer Posted January 31, 2010 Report Share Posted January 31, 2010 I know he is 35 and not the defensive player he once was but he much better offensively then Janish. I think he goes as a 2 or 7 in the line up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 To bad Janish couldn't find a way to hit better than .205 because then we wouldn't need to be dicussing this and they could have found a way to spend 3 million (we never knew they had) somewhere else. That being said, it's neither here nor there. Probably a solid move without providing the "WOW" factor. Then again, after the coin they dropped on Chapman, there won't be any "WOW" factors in the foreseeable future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 I think it was a good move. The only problem is, it's a one-year deal, and it's hard to get excited about those. It doesn't look like this team is built to win it all next year, so again, hard to get excited about a 1-year deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semiotter Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Good move Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGrizzlyBaer Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 I think it was a good move. The only problem is, it's a one-year deal, and it's hard to get excited about those. It doesn't look like this team is built to win it all next year, so again, hard to get excited about a 1-year deal.There is a mutual option for both in 2011 for 4 million. Plus I think it is better I mean he is 35, and think about getting burned like Tevares or Gonzalez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted February 2, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 I think it was a good move. The only problem is, it's a one-year deal, and it's hard to get excited about those. It doesn't look like this team is built to win it all next year, so again, hard to get excited about a 1-year deal.There is a mutual option for both in 2011 for 4 million. Plus I think it is better I mean he is 35, and think about getting burned like Tevares or GonzalezI would think they're just biding their time until someone comes along that they're really excited about. This is a temporary upgrade until then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.