BNGLS05 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 According to Lance Mcallister on 1530 Homer....the Bengals have signed Shawn Rogers. Anybody else hear this????? Quote
BlainThePain Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 According to Lance Mcallister on 1530 Homer....the Bengals have signed Shawn Rogers. Anybody else hear this?????I just saw it on ESPN. Quote
agreen_112 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 According to Lance Mcallister on 1530 Homer....the Bengals have signed Shawn Rogers. Anybody else hear this?????That's hillarious because I just wrote on another thread (30 seconds ago) GET SHAUN ROGERS GOT DAMNIT!!! LMAO. What did we give the Lions? 3rd rd pick?I'm a modern day Houdini!!! Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 The horribly unmotivated, near death DT from the Lions Shaun Rogers? That would surprise me. It's a big name trade if true. LB in round 1. Quote
Bengals44 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 According to Lance Mcallister on 1530 Homer....the Bengals have signed Shawn Rogers. Anybody else hear this?????That's hillarious because I just wrote on another thread (30 seconds ago) GET SHAUN ROGERS GOT DAMNIT!!! LMAO. What did we give the Lions? 3rd rd pick?Thats what I am wondering as well - 'cause it was a trade... I'll say one thing, this is a huge party - we never pull off things of this magnitude!! It sure changes are options come draft day as well...Damn, Im pumped! Quote
Bengals1 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well I'll be damned!Does this mean we "stole" him from the Broncos? Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well I'll be damned!Does this mean we "stole" him from the Broncos? What are the odds Goodell blames Odell for the theft? That's another two years. Quote
Bengals1 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well I'll be damned!Does this mean we "stole" him from the Broncos? What are the odds Goodell blames Odell for the theft? That's another two years. Quote
BNGLS05 Posted February 29, 2008 Author Report Posted February 29, 2008 Its not officially official.....if that makes sense . But Lance said it was confirmed from his agent but not by the Bengals. Quote
BlainThePain Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Is this a sign we're staying in the 4-3? Quote
bwillycuse Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Is this a sign we're staying in the 4-3?Think its a big sign that we are going to a 3-4.Wonder what we had to give up...3rd? Quote
Bengals1 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Its not officially official.....if that makes sense . But Lance said it was confirmed from his agent but not by the Bengals. From PFT:BENGALS BAG ROGERS by Michael David Smith Michael Smith of ESPN.com is reporting that the Detroit Lions have traded defensive tackle Shaun Rogers to the Cincinnati Bengals.No word is out yet on what the Lions got for Rogers, who had been on the trade block for several weeks and had been rumored to be heading to the Jaguars, Jets and Broncos, among other teams. For the Bengals, acquiring Rogers gives them just the kind of big defensive tackle head coach Marvin Lewis has always employed in his defense. The 340-pound Rogers is in the mold of Sam Adams and Tony Siragusa, the huge defensive tackles who played for the Super Bowl-winning Ravens team on which Lewis served as defensive coordinator. Quote
BlainThePain Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 His stats from last season were 39 total tackles, 26 solo, 7 sacks, 3 pass defenses, and an INT. Quote
GregCook Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Is this a sign we're staying in the 4-3?The guy had 7 sacks last year, two years worth for our entire line. He's an improvement.Now at what cost? Probably draft picks.Looks more and more like 3-4 is how they are heading. Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well if this turns out to be true then a 26 yr old DT not without a fair amount of talent is a bit alright. Just need to get him to give a s**t. Makes the first round interesting anyway. Quote
Bengals1 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Looks more and more like 3-4 is how they are heading.Geathers - Rogers - Rucker - ?Rivers with the #9? Quote
ChadJohnson-85 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 CANT WAIT TO SEE HIM IN A BENGALS JERSEY!!! WHO DEY!!! Quote
HoosierCat Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 All I can say is...wow. Hats off to Mikey.Hobs sez it's true...http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=6665 Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Looks more and more like 3-4 is how they are heading.Geathers - Rogers - Rucker - ?Rivers with the #9?Maybe Geathers is an OLB in the 3-4, not that it won't switch to a 4-3 at times? Reckon Fanene/Peko might be tried at DE if we do go to a 3-4. Quote
mgi Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well if this turns out to be true then a 26 yr old DT not without a fair amount of talent is a bit alright. Just need to get him to give a s**t. Makes the first round interesting anyway.I think he is 28.And maybe our new DC will 'zim' some life into him. Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 All I can say is...wow. Hats off to Mikey.Hobs sez it's true...http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=6665Indeed. Now that's dipping into the FA market! Considering our comp picks, a 3rd and a 5th isn't that bad. Quote
mgi Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 3rd and fifth round pick, per hob. I hope we got all of those comp picks. Quote
HoosierCat Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Looks more and more like 3-4 is how they are heading.Geathers - Rogers - Rucker - ?Rivers with the #9?Maybe Geathers is an OLB in the 3-4, not that it won't switch to a 4-3 at times? Reckon Fanene/Peko might be tried at DE if we do go to a 3-4.I don't think this move tells you anything about scheme. They could just as easily line his big butt up next to Peko in a 4-3 and that'd be fine with me. If he's the new NT, that's fine, too. Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Well if this turns out to be true then a 26 yr old DT not without a fair amount of talent is a bit alright. Just need to get him to give a s**t. Makes the first round interesting anyway.I think he is 28.And maybe our new DC will 'zim' some life into him.My bad, you're absolutely right. I hope so. Change of scenery might be what's needed.... Quote
Pidge Posted February 29, 2008 Report Posted February 29, 2008 Looks more and more like 3-4 is how they are heading.Geathers - Rogers - Rucker - ?Rivers with the #9?Maybe Geathers is an OLB in the 3-4, not that it won't switch to a 4-3 at times? Reckon Fanene/Peko might be tried at DE if we do go to a 3-4.I don't think this move tells you anything about scheme. They could just as easily line his big butt up next to Peko in a 4-3 and that'd be fine with me. If he's the new NT, that's fine, too.Right. Ultimately, a tackle that can get to the QB - something I've never seen in my admittedly young Bengals fandom - has got to be a good thing. This is where someone now tells me he's useless against the run. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.