Jet23 Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Did you just call Einstein a douche? Sure did. Einstein was still championing the constant state theory long after it had been disproven, and did so based upon a personal preference that rejected all evidence. So why should his feelings on what defines insanity be given weight? The man knowingly rejected reality. Einstein = DouchebagMaybe you shouldn't be quoting Einstein. There was no 'constant state theory'. There was a Steady State Theory, but that was Hoyle, not Einstein. I assume you are referring to the Cosmological Constant term invented by Einstein to stop the Universe from expanding as predicted by his Theory of General Relativity. Incidentally, much of the early expanding universe 'proof' that was used to discredit Einstein, has since been disproved. So, the scientists that were calling Einstein an idiot were actually idiots themselves.I watch the Discovery Channel too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Did you just call Einstein a douche? Sure did. Einstein was still championing the constant state theory long after it had been disproven, and did so based upon a personal preference that rejected all evidence. So why should his feelings on what defines insanity be given weight? The man knowingly rejected reality. Einstein = DouchebagMaybe you shouldn't be quoting Einstein. There was no 'constant state theory'. There was a Steady State Theory, but that was Hoyle, not Einstein. I assume you are referring to the Cosmological Constant term invented by Einstein to stop the Universe from expanding as predicted by his Theory of General Relativity. Incidentally, much of the early expanding universe 'proof' that was used to discredit Einstein, has since been disproved. So, the scientists that were calling Einstein an idiot were actually idiots themselves.I watch the Discovery Channel too.I thought the theory was the universe is expanding but at a certain point it will become to large and collaspe in upon itself. In essence creating a new big bang that will reset the cycle. Maybe I dont watch enough Discovery Channel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 A lot of you are too much doom and gloom. We haven't had a losing season in 3 years.Gimme a break with the injuries excuse. The last time the Bengals' won a playoff game the internet didn't even exist, cell phones were unheard of, and I wasn't even old enough to drink (I'm now less than two years shy of 40).So, sorry, 5 years of mediocre (now turning sour like the rest here) Marvin is not good enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 What has changed in the last two years?NothingThe Bengals are still a reactive team and not proactive, other teams look ahead and take action on a problem that may be on the horizon, the Bengals wait until they have a problem then when they realize it won't fix itself they take action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.