outsider73 Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 With Rudi Johnson currently listed as doubtful should I start Kenny Watson? Will he get a lot of carries? My other option is WR Nate Burelson who is going up against the San Fran defense. My team is injury plagued. Thanks Bengal fans! Quote
HoosierCat Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 Actually Rudi is listed as out. Watson had some good games as a temporary starter in DC. Of course, the bengals are going against the Pats, so who knows. Quote
BengalByTheBay Posted September 27, 2007 Report Posted September 27, 2007 I love fantasy questions like this one. Let's see, Bengals second RB against the #1 rated defense, hmmmmmmmmmmm. I'll go with 'no.'I would think that Burleson (who dropped almost everything thrown to him last week and still ended up with a TD) is a no brainer.Interesting that you would have Kenny Watson on your fantasy team. Either your league has 30 teams or you probably left a better RB option on the table somewhere. Quote
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted September 28, 2007 Report Posted September 28, 2007 With Rudi Johnson currently listed as doubtful should I start Kenny Watson? Will he get a lot of carries? My other option is WR Nate Burelson who is going up against the San Fran defense. My team is injury plagued. Thanks Bengal fans!Patriots defense + patchwork Bengals O-line + backup running back = hell no...and if that really is your best choice at this point you're dead anyway. Quote
711chad Posted September 28, 2007 Report Posted September 28, 2007 no dont start kenny...he prolly wont have more than 50 yards mayb a td Quote
outsider73 Posted September 28, 2007 Author Report Posted September 28, 2007 no dont start kenny...he prolly wont have more than 50 yards mayb a tdMy league has 10 teams and each team has 2 RB's and then a WR/RB option. So I'm pretty sure everyone has 3 RB's. RB options are bone dry. I just think with Watson that he'll get more chances to score than Burelson. But I guess I'll start the WR. I have Rudi Johnson(Doubtful/I heard Out) and Westbrook(Questionable). As you can see, I'm in deep s**t. Quote
Bengals44 Posted September 28, 2007 Report Posted September 28, 2007 I actually think Watson is a better fit vs. the Pats than Rudi is because he is faster, quicker and a much better receiver (obviously Rudi is the stronger of the two)... I cant see him getting more than 50-60 yards rushing, but I can easily envision 30-50 yards receiving to add too it... We most likely will be behind in the game and he will get a lot of dump offs and some set up screens... He could easily end up with 100+ total yards... He may have a better chance to get in the endzone off of a pass rather than a run... Quote
teenbengal14 Posted September 28, 2007 Report Posted September 28, 2007 im bettin watson has a good game cuz it seems he always does good whenever he touches the ball.. Quote
Bobcat Bengal Posted September 28, 2007 Report Posted September 28, 2007 im bettin watson has a good game cuz it seems he always does good whenever he touches the ball..NAS?!?! HEY WHAT'S UP MAN?!? I DIDN'T KNOW YOU WERE A BENGALS FAN!?! CAN YOU CHECK OUT MY MUSIC? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.