TJJackson Posted April 17, 2006 Report Posted April 17, 2006 I know very little about this guy, just posting the link for discussionhttp://www.registerguard.com/news/2006/04/...?section=sportsI honestly don't think we should be drafting a QB earlier than round 6, so if this guy really has slid up to day 1, I personally am not interested Quote
kingwilly Posted April 17, 2006 Report Posted April 17, 2006 Folks are thinking he may creep into r2....that is too high for us to take a QB...maybe r4 but not r2..there is too mch defensive talent and TE's too be had in r1-r3.I'd rather take McNeal in r4..more talent that can be used once Carson returns...or Barrick Nealy in r5-6. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted April 17, 2006 Report Posted April 17, 2006 I agree with both of you, day one is entirely to early (at least for my comfort) to take a QB with the dfensive talent that will be out there.McNeal would be more than appealing in the 4th if need be !!!WHODEY !!! Quote
schweinhart Posted April 17, 2006 Report Posted April 17, 2006 Clemens showed he can hit a WR in college that breaks routes and accelerates deep the way Chad does. That timing skill with the arm strength to get it there should be looked at favorably by all the teams looking to draft QBs this year.But a Day 1 QB pick by the Bengals would be a waste IMO whether it's Clemens, Croyle, Whitehurst or Jacobs. They've got other fish to fry even if Carson can't start right away. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.