Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's an awful deal ... Charles Woodson is only a year younger than Dillon for 1.

2. We would have to pay Woodson a gawd awful contract because he's been Franchised.

3. Why would we give up our second when we could get their 2nd for Dillon straight up.

4. Woodson has had 2 broken legs in 7 years. ( ok -fractures ) but he wouldn't hold up . At least it took Dillon 7 years before he got hurt.. and that was a groin.?

anybody willing to take that deal must have already had their nuts twisted the same way Dillon's was last year.

Posted
I just dont see how they think cwood is worth so damn much....?????

I say trade straight up money! We need to keep our precious picks!! No matter what the consensus is around here...I say they need Dillon more than we need Woodson! Keep our picks, or trade for other 1st & 2nd round picks!

Posted

these raider fans must think were stupid or something no way we give up our no. 1 pick or our 2nd pick we can find someone alot sweeter in the draft. I say dont count on seeing woodson in black and orange next year unless its dillon and woodson straight up and i still dont see that happening! <_<

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...