Kazkal Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 [i honestly don't think any starter on the Bengals O-line would start for the Bears and I wouldn't take any of their offensive skill players over the Bengals.Hahahahahahahahahaha thanks for the laugh Quote
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 Since we're making the comparisons, I honestly don't think any starter on the Bengals O-line would start for the Bears and I wouldn't take any of their offensive skill players over the Bengals.You have to be joking, you think Willie and Levi would both be backups in Chicago? Quote
Kazkal Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 It's good no doubt but ours > others stat wiseBearsTotal Rushing 2099Sacks given up 31BengalsTotal Rushing 1919Sacks given up 21(thats freaking good) we also rushed only 180ish yards less then them and they run heavy team where we had carson slinging the ball Quote
Tasher Posted March 21, 2006 Report Posted March 21, 2006 It's good no doubt but ours > others stat wiseBearsTotal Rushing 2099Sacks given up 31BengalsTotal Rushing 1919Sacks given up 21(thats freaking good) we also rushed only 180ish yards less then them and they run heavy team where we had carson slinging the ballJust to elaborate:Cin 459 rush attempts 4.2 yds per carry (w/ Rudi on a torn up knee, BTW)Chi 488 rush atts 4.3 yds per carry.1 yd = 3.6 inches (if I am doing the math right)Cin 538 pass attempts w/ 21 sacks thats .0390 sacks per attempt!Chi 418 pass attempts w 31 sacks .0742 sacks per attGee, thats 10 more sacks in 120 fewer attempts. I'll take the Bengal OL intact over the Bears OL anyday. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.