F.Cleveland Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 Just curious if anyone would be interested in trading up to say the 4th spot and getting Mario if that's even possible. If not that high, then how high up and to get who? Quote
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 Naw. I'd almost never want to see us trade up with the scouting team we have in place. We still have enough holes at different positions to fill that there will certainly be someone where we pick.No Safety? No problem, grab a DT.No DT? No problem, grab a DE.No DE? No problem, grab a CB.No CB? No Problem, grab a TE. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 Yep, I can't see this being the year we trade up either. To many directions to go and to many prospects will be available at #24. As a matter of fact, I could see another trade DOWN in the first. Who wouldn't love to have another day one pick THIS year ???WHODEY !!! Quote
BTG Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 Yep, I can't see this being the year we trade up either. To many directions to go and to many prospects will be available at #24. As a matter of fact, I could see another trade DOWN in the first. Who wouldn't love to have another day one pick THIS year ???WHODEY !!!The only time I've ever wanted Cincy to trade up was two years ago. I had worked out this whole scenario where they traded Corey Dillion and their #1 pick to someone in the top five so they could take Sean Taylor.Of course, they picked up Madieu in that daft, so what the heck do I know? Quote
Stripes Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 I can't imagine ever liking the trade up idea, especially going all the way from 24th to the top 5. I like having plenty of picks, and trust the scouting team to land good players in every round. Quote
kingwilly Posted March 17, 2006 Report Posted March 17, 2006 I don't see a reason to move up...the guys you really see moving up make a grab for a franchise QB/RB/WR.....and we look good in those areas...One could argue that M. Williams or V. Davis may be worth the cost...but there is not that much fall-off behind those guys...Kiwi is 98% of Mario Williams and Pope/Lewis are just a small bit behind Davis. Quote
Kazkal Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Vdavis,Super mario or ngata all worth cost but doubt be affordable inless any of them feel 15ish Quote
BlainThePain Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Trading from 24 to 5 would cost us this years first, this years second, and next years first. Besides that, this draft is really deep. You can get a freakish athlete at 32 this year. I wouldn't mind seeing them trade up some spots to get Bunkley is he falls in the draft though. Quote
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Yep, I can't see this being the year we trade up either. To many directions to go and to many prospects will be available at #24. As a matter of fact, I could see another trade DOWN in the first. Who wouldn't love to have another day one pick THIS year ???WHODEY !!!The only time I've ever wanted Cincy to trade up was two years ago. I had worked out this whole scenario where they traded Corey Dillion and their #1 pick to someone in the top five so they could take Sean Taylor.Of course, they picked up Madieu in that daft, so what the heck do I know? Madieu's OK, but he can't spit as far as Taylor. I don't think there's any possibility of getting in the top 5, but if we could move up 5 spots or so I might do it if it meant getting Bunk. Quote
Bengalbob Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 What kind of price have teams paid in the past to move up from somewhere around 24? Quote
HoTbOy Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 For a team that likes to build from the draft the price is too high...and I really don't see a player worth it, maybe Bunkley...if he fell to 20th(which i doubt) then maybe you try...otherwise i would not do... Quote
WretchedOne Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 I would not object to the Bengals trading up and taking Ngata. Quote
walshfan Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 I would not object to the Bengals trading up and taking Ngata.We would have go give up our 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks this year to move up to #8 ( buffalo) to get Ngata... thats based on the value board.. not gonna happen... Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 It would be nice to have him but I doubt we will move up. It is stupid,there is so much depth in the draft we don't need to. Plain and effing simple Quote
Kazkal Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 I would not object to the Bengals trading up and taking Ngata.We would have go give up our 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks this year to move up to #8 ( buffalo) to get Ngata... thats based on the value board.. not gonna happen...actually you have talk raiders in giving up their pick and chance of omar in the 2ndDT in 1st round isen't seeming as deep as it did before...with ngata and bunk the only sure 1st rnders probbley sense wright,wroten and watson all fell out and be lucky sneak back in Quote
BlainThePain Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 I would not object to the Bengals trading up and taking Ngata.I'm actually starting to think that Bunkley is a better prospect than Ngata. Quote
WretchedOne Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Ngata is a one time DT prospect that only comes around every ten years.Ngata is the FAR better player. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 I would not object to the Bengals trading up and taking Ngata.I'm actually starting to think that Bunkley is a better prospect than Ngata. Put down the crack pipe my friend it's eating away your brain !!!Ngata is a beast and BY FAR the best DT in the draft. Don't get me wrong, I love the thought of getting "The Bunk", but Ngata is at the top of this years DT prospects !!!WHODEY !!! Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 Ngata is one of those rare players that is super huge and can still fly. He played coverage at times at Oregon. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.