Jump to content

Bengals sign Dexter Jackson to 4-year deal


bucket

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Source: Bengals agree with Jackson

By GEOFF HOBSON

March 13, 2006

1:45 p.m.

According to a NFL source, the Bengals have reached a four-year deal with Tampa Bay safety Dexter Jackson, their first free-agent of the offseason. No terms were available.

The salaries were just released on KFFL

Bengals | Contract update: D. Jackson

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:50:04 -0800

Cincinnati Bengals FS Dexter Jackson signed a four-year contract that includes base salaries of $800,000 (2006), $1.0 million (2007), $1.3 million (2008) and $1.5 million (2009).

Looks like a round 1 or 2 safety pick to me....

I don't know what makes you say that. Just because we got Jackson cheap?

I thought the main reason we went out and got a veteran safety was so that we wouldn't be forced to reach for a specific position on draft day. Now we have other bigger more immediate needs than SS for our 1st pick. Although... I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if we used a 3rd rounder to get a safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source: Bengals agree with Jackson

By GEOFF HOBSON

March 13, 2006

1:45 p.m.

According to a NFL source, the Bengals have reached a four-year deal with Tampa Bay safety Dexter Jackson, their first free-agent of the offseason. No terms were available.

The salaries were just released on KFFL

Bengals | Contract update: D. Jackson

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:50:04 -0800

Cincinnati Bengals FS Dexter Jackson signed a four-year contract that includes base salaries of $800,000 (2006), $1.0 million (2007), $1.3 million (2008) and $1.5 million (2009).

Looks like a round 1 or 2 safety pick to me....

I don't know what makes you say that. Just because we got Jackson cheap?

I thought the main reason we went out and got a veteran safety was so that we wouldn't be forced to reach for a specific position on draft day. Now we have other bigger more immediate needs than SS for our 1st pick. Although... I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if we used a 3rd rounder to get a safety.

Getting a veteran safety just makes it easier to pick a guy early. Jackson is being paid backup numbers. It's clear as the cloud of smoke around Spain's head. We still have three immediate needs. 1. Safety. 2. Defensive Line. 3. Tight End. In the first round, the player must absolutely be a sure thing. He should be an immediate starter. We can find that at safety or tight end this year, and there is a clear grade of difference between players at both position. The fact is, defensive tackles and even defensive ends are iffy picks early. They are hit or miss. On the other hand, safeties tend to be sure things. Jackson's numbers look to me to be the veteran backup numbers for a guy who will be a role model to a young early pick. The only question is, does one of the more attractive DTs fall to us in round 1, and how many safeties fly out before our pick. As for TE, I'm still hoping we wait until day two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you really keep that many safeties on the roster?

1. Dexter Jackson

2. Madieu

3. KK

4. Kim Herring

5. Draft Pick

6. Anthony Mitchell

7. Indiana Jones

8. Body

9. Bua

Don't the Bengals try to stay with only 4-5 safeties? What are they going to do with all these guys? I assume they are letting Mitchell go, Jones was a practice squad guy but up and coming, but then what? We have a total overload of safeties! :blink:

We have 8 Safeties and one free agent safety and only 4 corners and one free agent corner on the roster. :huh: With Greg Brooks as our 4th corner. Do the Bengals plan on switching any of the safeties to corner? I guess we could always have KK play spot duty at corner, but we have to get rid of some of these safeties and pick up another corner.

Body played safety in college but has always been listed as a CB with the Bengals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...