Lindner back on list of the world's richest

[Kirkendall]

Cincinnati financier Carl H. Lindner Jr. has rejoined Forbes magazine's annual list of billionaires. And Richard Farmer, chairman of Mason-based Cintas Corp., made the list for the fourth straight year.

Farmer's net worth of $1.7 billion landed him in the 342nd spot, tied with others, down from No. 303 last year. His net worth last year totaled $1.4 billion.

Lindner, who was last on the list in 1996, was tied in the 356th spot this year, with a net worth of $1.6 billion.

Farmer and Lindner were the only Cincinnati-area residents. They were among eight Ohioans and three from Indiana on the list of the world's billionaires. New York-based Forbes listed no billionaires from Kentucky.

Newcomers included J.K. Rowling - author of the Harry Potter series - and the founders of the Google search engine, Sergey Brin and Larry Page ($1 billion each).

Rallying stocks and a strong euro swelled the list to the longest it's ever been.

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates remains perched atop the list for the 10th straight year, but investor Warren Buffett is nipping at his heels. Gates' net worth is now estimated at $46.6 billion - still less than half the $100 billion it peaked at in 1998, but up about 13 percent from the $40.7 billion Forbes attributed to him in 2003.

Buffett had the best gains of the year. He increased his net worth by $12.4 billion to $42.9 billion, significantly narrowing the gap between him and Gates, with whom he competes in bridge tournaments.

German supermarket magnate Karl Albrecht remained in third place, with a fortune of $23 billion. Close behind were Saudi Arabia's Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud, whose $21.5 billion nest egg put him just ahead of Microsoft's other co-founder, Paul Allen, who came in fifth with $21 billion.

Rounding out the top 10 were Helen Walton, wife of the late Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton, and four members of her family. They were tied for sixth, with each worth an estimated $20 billion - making for a Walton's mountain of money that's bigger than the holdings of Gates and Buffett combined.

All told, it was a fabulous year to be very rich. The magazine counted 587 billionaires around the world, up from 476 in 2003. Their total net worth jumped to $1.9 trillion from the $1.4 trillion the magazine counted in 2003.

"After two years of significantly falling fortunes, we really saw an uptick for just about everybody on the list," said Luisa Kroll, an associate editor at Forbes who oversaw the project.

The strength of the euro currency in comparison to the dollar helped launch 22 new billionaires to the list, for a total of 164 Europeans. Their net worth as a group surged 47 percent to $578 billion.

Rising oil prices helped Russia add eight new billionaires for a total of 25. That put the country in third place, behind the United States and Germany.

As usual, older, married men dominated the list, which includes only 53 women and 24 single people. The average billionaire's age is 64, and only 27 are under 40.

Only six people dropped off the list, compared with 67 who fell off in 2003 and 83 drop-offs in 2002, according to Kroll. One of the notable drop-offs this year was Robert Johnson, the founder of Black Entertainment Television, who lost some of his fortune in a divorce settlement.

There were three billionaires behind bars: Russia's richest man, former Yukos oil chief Mikhail Khodorkovsy ($15 billion); Yukos shareholder Platon Lebedev ($1.8 billion); and Japanese tycoon Yasuo Takei ($6.2 billion.)

[redsfan2]

Does this just make your dam nose bleed or what ???????????????

I really do hate badmouthing this man because of all the good he does in the community .......... BUT ... he pulls one cheap trick after another, and doesn't even have the excuse of not having the financial means of putting a top flight team on the field. I'm not suggesting that he should employ the same tactics as Steinbrenner ( who Lindner could make an indentured servant if he wanted to ), but fer crissakes be willing to pay more than minimum wage anyway.

I agree that a new hospital wing is more imprtant than any ball player, and the choice between the 2 would be easy to make even for me. You get the hospital 10 times out of 10. On the other hand, he doesn't have to choose. He is perfectly capable of having both.

As to the comment ( on another thread ) about the Yankees spending less than they make, the Reds opening day sold out in 16 minutes. Put a perennial winner on the field in Cincy and see what they make.

Pro sports teams are the ultimate rich mans toy. Most owners recognize that and act accordingly. When the owner of the 49'ers found out that the Cowboys had just built a new state of the art training center, he built a new one as well and made sure it was better. This was just after they had won one of their superbowls, and his rationale was that the guys on his team were the champions, and no one should have a better facility than them. Now thats how you handle your team !

[Bobcat Bengal]

None of the owner's are hurting for money....its just the degree of frugality...there's no possible way that they could ever spend it all, they just don't feel right in blowing that much money in their eyes. Look at mark cuban, he's like the NBA's version of Steinbrenner....a while back I used to be like, Dallas Who? But now he has them a perennial Playoff contender in a fierce Western Conference...he's not afraid to part with his money either....the Dallas maverick facilities and state of the art....its just the type of owner a team has....if the owner realizes he should make his team happy, and do whatever it takes to get and keep a winning team on the field, thats what he's gonna do...

haha....320th on the richiest people? A 1.78 billion?!?! What am I doing with my life?

[redsfan2]

None of the owner's are hurting for money....its just the degree of frugality...there's no possible way that they could ever spend it all, they just don't feel right in blowing that much money in their eyes.

Please don't take this as defending Mike Brown, but his business was the Bengals as opposed to guys like Lindner who have multiple businesses and have sprts teams as a hobby.

MB did have to make money off the Bengals becasue they were his only business. All of that changed of course when the nice people of Hamilton county bought him a new stadium and said that he could keep all the money that it made. For all he did for football and Cincy by bringing in hte Bengals, Mikes dad wasn't known for his deep pockets either. He expected guys to want to play their hearts out for the love of the game, and money should only be an afterthought.

[Kirkendall]

None of the owner's are hurting for money....its just the degree of frugality...there's no possible way that they could ever spend it all, they just don't feel right in blowing that much money in their eyes.

Please don't take this as defending Mike Brown, but his business was the Bengals as opposed to guys like Lindner who have multiple businesses and have sprts teams as a hobby.

MB did have to make money off the Bengals becasue they were his only business. All of that changed of course when the nice people of Hamilton county bought him a new stadium and said that he could keep all the money that it made. For all he did for football and Cincy by bringing in hte Bengals, Mikes dad wasn't known for his deep pockets either. He expected guys to want to play their hearts out for the love of the game, and money should only be an afterthought.

Plus, money wasn't in issue in those days for players. They just wanted to be paid to live, now players can't live without bigtime pay. Sad really.