Jump to content

Explain this to me.


walzav29

Recommended Posts

Why is it that the only time the Bengals are referred to as good, is when another team is beating them? If the Bengals aren't any good than no one should be patting them on their backs for beating the lowly Bengals.

I agree. Curnutte pissed me off yesterday morning. He is now qualifying wins by saying the Bengals haven't beaten a team with a winning record when they played that team. In other words it makes no differece that Chicago is now playing well and Minnesota has won three of four and will get to .500 if they win tonight. Last time I checked, Indy is in the same division with Tennessee and Houston two of the bottom five teams in the league. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals suck. If that's what the media wants to think, then let them. Because I know the teams don't think the Bengals suck, because Peyton had to play one of the best games of his life yesterday and they still barely won. So let the fat, loser journalists talk. Because they're not on the field, so they don't count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals suck. If that's what the media wants to think, then let them. Because I know the teams don't think the Bengals suck, because Peyton had to play one of the best games of his life yesterday and they still barely won. So let the fat, loser journalists talk. Because they're not on the field, so they don't count.

Roger that! I'm so sick of these loser justifying their record by their 'easy schedule'. The Bengals are the ONLY team to win in Soldier Field. Even Carolina, everyone's latest sexy pick for the Super Bowl, went to Chicago and got waxed.

If these morons don't recognize the fact that they are good by now, screw them. They will find out soon enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bengals suck. If that's what the media wants to think, then let them. Because I know the teams don't think the Bengals suck, because Peyton had to play one of the best games of his life yesterday and they still barely won. So let the fat, loser journalists talk. Because they're not on the field, so they don't count.

Roger that! I'm so sick of these loser justifying their record by their 'easy schedule'. The Bengals are the ONLY team to win in Soldier Field. Even Carolina, everyone's latest sexy pick for the Super Bowl, went to Chicago and got waxed.

If these morons don't recognize the fact that they are good by now, screw them. They will find out soon enough!

Going into Soldier Field looks like a great win! And so does beating MINN all of a sudden, especially since we plastered them...and maybe the wins in CLE and BALT...man, those are tough places to play, regardless of the quality of the team...

Why is it that the only time the Bengals are referred to as good, is when another team is beating them? If the Bengals aren't any good than no one should be patting them on their backs for beating the lowly Bengals.

I agree. Curnutte pissed me off yesterday morning. He is now qualifying wins by saying the Bengals haven't beaten a team with a winning record when they played that team. In other words it makes no differece that Chicago is now playing well and Minnesota has won three of four and will get to .500 if they win tonight. Last time I checked, Indy is in the same division with Tennessee and Houston two of the bottom five teams in the league. :angry:

BTW jjakq27, AWESOME sig pic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

was that from Massillon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...