not-another Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 It was based on 1 was the best, 32 was the worst. I think it was by sporting news, but they had teams with lower records ahead of us. They had the damn Saints ahead of us. But, that was just someones opinion, not fact. Because, we all know the Bengals would be 11 or 12. Quote
turningpoint Posted February 15, 2005 Report Posted February 15, 2005 LOL the saints are better then us....they got a better RB.a Probowl WR.2 probowl D linemen.a probowl LB.Decent 2ndary.and a pretty good qb, no carson palmer in 2 years, but not a bad qb.a probowl kick returner.....Saints are better until our D improves. Quote
not-another Posted February 16, 2005 Author Report Posted February 16, 2005 LOL the saints are better then us....they got a better RB.a Probowl WR.2 probowl D linemen.a probowl LB.Decent 2ndary.and a pretty good qb, no carson palmer in 2 years, but not a bad qb.a probowl kick returner.....Saints are better until our D improves. I always knew you was a Saints Closet Fan. Quote
tibor75 Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 Too bad they don't award playoff births in the off season. Quote
San Antonio Bengal Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 All the Saints will ever be is a 7 - 9 team, unlike our Bengals which will be in the playoffs next season. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.