IfItsBrownFlushItDown Posted October 4, 2004 Report Posted October 4, 2004 NFL.comI think Kitna and a 2nd rounder would have looked a LOT more attractive. I know he's not a run-stopping DT but with a horrible D you gotta start somewhere.Plus, look at the added bonus: all the people wanting to see Kitna play could watch the Packers games. Quote
Kirkendall Posted October 4, 2004 Report Posted October 4, 2004 With the $$$ we are paying James and O'Neal, I really don't expect the Bengals to look to make any moves on defense; not even the d-line -- they've had their chance and blown it.Shesh - I've been sounding negative lately. I guess that's what a 1-3 record does for ya. Quote
Skilly McRailnob Posted October 5, 2004 Report Posted October 5, 2004 Would have been nice to add him. The price didn't seem that high, though who knows how hard it would be to resign him?http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1894820 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.