Tooch gets gone

[jonahdsage]

Actually, I have never been wrong about anything. Everything I have ever been accused of being wrong about I have actually turned out to be correct on.

I thought up an example of you being dead wrong in about two-thirds of a second, moron. You shouted to the entire board that the 2009 Bengals were better on the road than at home, which turned out completely false (as evidenced by six wins at home and only four on the road).

Useless cretin.

I didn't say the bengals had a better record on the road than at home. I said they played better. Hell, the bengals played awful at home against the Lions last year and won the game. They played much better against san diego on the road, but lost the game.

Once again, the only time people thnk I am wrong about something, it's due to their own lack of comprehension about what I ACTUALLY said.

Nice try though...

I guess the question is, then, would you rather have a team that "played better" or a team that won? Maybe we could go back to the days of scoring 41 points against cleveland only to lose by a touchdown. At least we would have really huge offensive stats.

[JoePong]

What home games did the bengals play so well in?

Denver - they were terrible - were shut out for 59 minutes.

Pittsburgh - they were dominated for 3 quarters -rallied in the 4th. They played better against the steelers on the road than they did at home.

Cleveland - not very impressive - barely sqeaked out a 3 point win

Houston - once again they were horrible

Detroit - they were very unimpressive against a really bad team

Kansas City - again, they were really bad, needing a last second TD to dege a really bad team

Baltimore - they played really good in the 1st quarter, but nothing after that. They were more impressive in baltimore than against the ravens at home

Chicago - the one game they were actually good in on both sides of the ball

Now, especially offensively, how pathetic was the bengals offense at home? Other than the game against the bears, the offense was absolutely putrid at home last season...and they played some rally bad teams.

The offense did better on the road against good teams than they did at home against lousy teams. Green Bay, Sand Diego, Baltimore...

[JoePong]

Actually, I have never been wrong about anything. Everything I have ever been accused of being wrong about I have actually turned out to be correct on.

I thought up an example of you being dead wrong in about two-thirds of a second, moron. You shouted to the entire board that the 2009 Bengals were better on the road than at home, which turned out completely false (as evidenced by six wins at home and only four on the road).

Useless cretin.

I didn't say the bengals had a better record on the road than at home. I said they played better. Hell, the bengals played awful at home against the Lions last year and won the game. They played much better against san diego on the road, but lost the game.

Once again, the only time people thnk I am wrong about something, it's due to their own lack of comprehension about what I ACTUALLY said.

Nice try though...

I guess the question is, then, would you rather have a team that "played better" or a team that won? Maybe we could go back to the days of scoring 41 points against cleveland only to lose by a touchdown. At least we would have really huge offensive stats.

I want to be a good home team. That means playing well at home. If you are not a good home team, you lose first round playoff games on your home field...like we have the last two times we have made the playoffs.