Ken Anderson was better than Steve McNair

[walzav29]

I'm seeing it being debated if McNair should be in the HOF. No. If Kenny is not in there then McNair shouldn't be. Ken has him on yards and TD's, and they both have SB losses. Steve gets alot of love for his final drive in the SB, but they didn't get a TD so I don't get it. I'm not trying to bash the guy, I'm just talking about from a football perspective. Ken Anderson was a better QB.

[ArmyBengal]

The debate about Kenny Anderson and the Hall of Fame will go on and on, but I think he deserves to be there.

While I love the type of player McNair was, I don't think he's a Hall of Fame player.

If they vote him in, it will be on sympathy and I don't think he would have wanted that...

[redsbengalsbucks]

No doubt about it Anderson was better than McNair was.

[Pidge]

Well if he is voted in due to an untimely and unfortunate death then Ken better sleep with one eye open. Some fans go further than others ya know.

[Esiason#7]

The only thing that I can think of that McNair would have an advantage over Ken Anderson would be that he has more playoff victories. Ken Anderson only won two playoff games in his entire Bengals career, both in the 1981 season. Anderson has overall better stats, not to mention four league passing titles. (I think it was four). I'm in the boat to say if McNair got in the HOF and Anderson does not then the system is seriously flawed. Don't get me wrong, I loved McNair, but I don't think he should get in "the hall" over Ken Anderson.