NYBengalfan Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Ben dropped ball with old coachMonday, October 01, 2007By Ron Cook, Pittsburgh Post-GazetteGLENDALE, Ariz. -- What was one of Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger's ridiculous criticisms of his former offensive coordinator, Ken Whisenhunt, after he left to take the Arizona Cardinals' job? That he was too conservative?You could have fooled me yesterday.Actually, Whisenhunt fooled the Steelers.Badly.There are a number of reasons for Whisenhunt to feel good about his Cardinals' 21-14 victory against the Steelers. You know the obvious one, the one involving the Steelers' decision not to give him their head coaching job when Bill Cowher left after last season despite Whisenhunt's fine work with Roethlisberger and the offense in the Super Bowl year of 2005 and the 15-1 season of 2004. Revenge is oh so sweet."Oh, yeah, this is really big for Whiz," said Cardinals wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald, a former Pitt star who played a huge part in the victory. "This was definitely not a normal week for us. You could tell Whiz really wanted us to get after it."But there was another big reason.Whisenhunt's play calling was huge.It was anything but conservative."That's my mentality," Whisenhunt said afterward, thoroughly confused why Roethlisberger has gone out of his way to attempt to create a grudge between them, much as another great Steelers quarterback -- Terry Bradshaw -- tried to create a silly, imaginary one a few decades ago with Chuck Noll.It's a crying shame Roethlisberger didn't see Whisenhunt before the game. There was a love-fest when Whisenhunt came onto the field; maybe two-dozen Steelers rushed over to hug him. It's hard to believe it was an accident that Big Ben wasn't among them, especially after he didn't have the class to go congratulate Whisenhunt after the win. "Hopefully, one day, we'll talk," Whisenhunt said.It's not like Whisenhunt lacked for people patting him on the back.His players were thrilled for him."We all really wanted to win this game," Fitzgerald said. "We've had it circled since the schedule came out."Whisenhunt's take?"If you're asking me if I'm excited about us beating the Steelers, sure I am. But I don't have any animosity toward that football team. What I'm proud of is our guys stepping up and making plays and beating a good team to win a game that no one gave us a chance to win."This gives us something to build on. It makes us feel like we can play with anybody."Whisenhunt's prints were all over the victory, starting with the way he handled his quarterbacks. For the second week in a row, he benched young starter Matt Leinart and brought in old vet Kurt Warner to run the no-huddle offense to give the Cardinals a spark. It worked exactly as planned; Warner led a long third-quarter touchdown drive to tie the score, 7-7.But after Steve Breaston's 73-yard punt return for a score gave the Cardinals a 14-7 lead, Whisenhunt went back to Leinart. Together, the two were marvelous on a touchdown drive that clinched the victory.On first down at the Arizona 18, when everybody in the rocket ship-like stadium was thinking run, Whisenhunt had Leinart run a play fake to running back Edgerrin James and throw a deep pass to Fitzgerald, who beat cornerback Ike Taylor and made a terrific catch for a 38-yard gain."That play was something we worked on all week," Whisenhunt said. "We were just waiting for the right time.""I lobbied for it," said Fitzgerald, who had 11 catches for 123 yards. "I told coach, 'Just give me a shot. Let me make a play.' "Later in that drive, Whisenhunt had Leinart sneak for a first down on fourth-and-1 at the Steelers' 24 when a Neil Rackers field goal would have given the Cardinals a 10-point lead."I'd have been a dummy if that one didn't work," Whisenhunt said. "It just felt like the right call. I had a lot of faith in our line."On the next play, Whisenhunt called another play-action pass, this one to wide receiver Bryant Johnson for an 11-yard gain.Not exactly conservative, right?"We thought they'd be playing the run and we'd have a shot with the pass," Whisenhunt said, shrugging.James scored on a 2-yard run moments later to complete a near-perfect day for Whisenhunt. His team didn't just beat the Steelers, his old team. He was able to get Leinart -- his new team's future -- back in the game and have him go home feeling good about himself."He showed you why he's going to be a really good quarterback in this league," Whisenhunt said.The man knows one when he sees one.He had Roethlisberger, didn't he?"I'd never say anything bad about Ben," Whisenhunt said. "He's a good quarterback and a good kid."Whisenhunt would have told that to Roethlisberger's face yesterday. Too bad Big Ben didn't have the decency to give him the chance.First published on October 1, 2007 at 12:00 amRon Cook can be reached at rcook@post-gazette.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 A sign of immaturity for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYBengalfan Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I dont know why there would be any hostility between the two. It clearly is all created by Rothlisberger. They had a successful run together and every time Whis would talk about Ben it would only be good things.Grow up Ben. You dont have to shake his hand before the game, nobody will get on you for that. You shouldnt have a love fest with the enemy before the game. But after the game he should have done the right thing and congratulated him.Its not a sign of immaturity, its a sign of being a "STILLER"........ oops did I say Stiller I meant sore loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The PatternMaster Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 ****NEWS FLASH****We have a breaking development in this story coming from Pissburgh...It has been confirmed that "Big" Ben Rothelisburger has been officially labeled a douchebag.We will keep you updated as this story develops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Its not a sign of immaturity, its a sign of being a "STILLER"........ oops did I say Stiller I meant sore loser.In fairness to Ben...he was being a d**kwad before the game too. So he's not a sore loser, just an @sshole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerFan87 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 That's the only problem I have with Ben. He's a great QB, but he's also kind of an ass. I wish he'd just shut up and play instead of taking every opportunity to take a jab at Cowher or Whiz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYBengalfan Posted October 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 That's the only problem I have with Ben. He's a great QB, but he's also kind of an ass. I wish he'd just shut up and play instead of taking every opportunity to take a jab at Cowher or Whiz.My only beef with the situation is that he didnt shake his hand after the game. Before the game is a totally different story. You are going to war with this team. If you were in Iraq would you shake the hand of an Iraqi pointing a gun at you?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 That's the only problem I have with Ben. He's a great QB, but he's also kind of an ass. I wish he'd just shut up and play instead of taking every opportunity to take a jab at Cowher or Whiz. It is sort of remarkable the way he's distanced himself from both of those men, but I think it stems from the perception that neither man fully trusted Roethlisberger in the way that all other franchise QB's are. Let's be honest here, outside of Pittsburgh Roethlisbergers image seems to be equal parts big young stud and lazy lucky guy who blindly stumbled into the perfect situation, and while that assesment isn't entirely wrong it's just as true that it isn't completely accurate. Ben knows that, resents it too, and seems pretty determined to prove everyone wrong. So far the results seem mixed. The Steeler offense seems more wide open at times, but in both Steeler games I've watched this season there have been stretches where he's missed nearly a dozen passes in a row. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted October 5, 2007 Report Share Posted October 5, 2007 That's the only problem I have with Ben. He's a great QB, but he's also kind of an ass. I wish he'd just shut up and play instead of taking every opportunity to take a jab at Cowher or Whiz.I would change the "great QB" to "good QB" and add that this seems to be a trend in SB winning QB's for Pittsburgh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.