BENGALTHEM Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 So with all this talk about getting a defensive tackle. Does this mean that the Dlinemen we picked up last year (Powell, Thorton, and Clemons) bad moves? I thought these guys were supposed to be the answer for our D-line? Why was this line with Smith, Thorton, Williams and Clemons so ineffective at stopping the run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkendall Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 So with all this talk about getting a defensive tackle. Does this mean that the Dlinemen we picked up last year (Powell, Thorton, and Clemons) bad moves? I thought these guys were supposed to be the answer for our D-line? Why was this line with Smith, Thorton, Williams and Clemons so ineffective at stopping the run? Well, I don't the D-lines sole responsiblity is to stop the run per say. The primary function of the D-Line is to clog holes and gaps so the Linebackers can clean up the mess. If we have a DT that can shed a block and make the tackle, then hell yea; but I don't think it's a requirement. That's why guys that can shed a block and make the tackle are Pro Bowlers every year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntpou Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 last years signings were a upgrade from what we had. Same with this year Marvin just keeps adding better playerand depth at all the positions. This is what he will continue to do year after year. :player: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrishcovga Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 It's actually a simple format Bengalthem. - You add a free agent to fill a hole until a drafted player can develop into a starter. At the begining of free Agency I said that there were a number of Bengal players that would not be here in '04. 1. Artrell Hawkins2. Jeff Burris3. Oliver Gibson4. Tony Williams- who'll probably be cut when we sign Gardner officially. ( Remember Marvin Lewis' motto- " if you're paid to start, and you don't then you won't be here !)5. Kevin Kaesviharn - really took my by surprise that he was brought back, but just because he signed a contract, doesn't mean he's guaranteed a roster spot. -- Marquand Manuel is the Better Special teams player, so any drafted safety will most likely push KK or MM off the roster.* One thing that is for sure, the same positions that we signed in FA, will be the same positions that we draft !1.Nate Webster - lb round 2- 52. Kim Herring - s rounds 2- 53. Deltha Oneal- cb 1- 54. Rich Braham - 1-45. a replacement for Corey possibly and 6. Bobbie Williams - g - 1.? maybe Vernon Carey - 6...7. Daryl Gardner - dt - a dt should come from day 1.Seems kinda vague, but those are the rounds that we'll get value at for those players.- We'll also have to address the DE spot since Clemons and Powell aren't signed past '04. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cover2 Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 It would be nice if Tony williams could stick around and play backup. But Powells got to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schweinhart Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Free agent fill a hole then draft for the future looks like a good formula.I'd say the guard position is not needed, though, since Williams is relatively young. A 2nd DE would be good instead. Plus we got nine picks.So how about:1) Randy Starks DT2) Rodney Leisle DT3) Tommy Kelley DE3) Tony Hargrove DE4) Rod Davis LB4) Alex Stepanovich C5) Brandon Johnson RB6) Josh Buhl SS7) Greg Golden CB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntpou Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 R.Starks plays both DT DE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schweinhart Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 If he could play them both at the same time, he solve the DL dilemma on his own.The draft guru seems right about Williams at DT, which would only leave Thornton left there from last year.I'd like to see Wlliams' $2.5 mill put toward a bid for Ravens DE Marques Douglas by Friday. Even if the Ravens re-sign him, the less cap room they got the better.www.baltimoresun.com/media/thumbnails/photo/2003-09/9410082.jpg (Douglas sacking Holcomb)Either way, it seems like an even heavier D-line draft with the signings to this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntpou Posted April 15, 2004 Report Share Posted April 15, 2004 We need a DE in the draft now with gardner signed. Clemons is not the answer . A.Odom or M.Hill sounds alot better to along with J.Smith D.Gardner, J.Thorton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.