Its safe to say that Peter King....

[NYBengalfan]

Carolina (4-2) at Cincinnati (3-2)

"I really think Steve Smith is back, all the way," Jake Delhomme told me the other day. "He's not thinking about his legs anymore. He's just running.'' Bad news for the Bengals. By the way, when will Chad Johnson be his 2004 and 2005 self again? The leaves have turned and he has one touchdown.

Carolina 24, Cincinnati 14

I am happy..... His fat ass was holding us back in the first place!!!.....(We kept bottoming out)

[derekshank]

Yeah. He's been off the bandwagon since the Patriots game. He was barely ever on the wagon to begin with. Frankly, it's a big old "who cares." I value his opinion about the same as a magic disappearing poopie.

[bengalboomer7]

The man is doing his job writing a column, and picking against a team that's now lost two straight games, looking pretty bad in each game. He's picking off of what he's seen on the field

[derekshank]

The man is doing his job writing a column, and picking against a team that's now lost two straight games, looking pretty bad in each game. He's picking off of what he's seen on the field

So what? The Steelers lost 3 in a row, looking horrible doing it. People still expected them to beat KC.

I'm not saying I'm pissed because he picked against us. I think if someone thinks the Bengals lose this game, it's justified. But with Peter King... he's said some things about the Bengals in the past year or so, and instead of admitting he's wrong about them, looks for every opportunity to root against them so that he can say he was right. I've never heard him say an intelligent thing about football, so I ignore him. He said the Bengals were doing it with smoke and mirrors last year, and now roots for himself to be right every time they play. He's not an informed analyst. He's a normal everyday football fan with a column.

[bengalboomer7]

The man is doing his job writing a column, and picking against a team that's now lost two straight games, looking pretty bad in each game. He's picking off of what he's seen on the field

So what? The Steelers lost 3 in a row, looking horrible doing it. People still expected them to beat KC.

I'm not saying I'm pissed because he picked against us. I think if someone thinks the Bengals lose this game, it's justified. But with Peter King... he's said some things about the Bengals in the past year or so, and instead of admitting he's wrong about them, looks for every opportunity to root against them so that he can say he was right. I've never heard him say an intelligent thing about football, so I ignore him. He said the Bengals were doing it with smoke and mirrors last year, and now roots for himself to be right every time they play. He's not an informed analyst. He's a normal everyday football fan with a column.

SO what if people expected the Squeelers to beat KC, KC isn't Carolina and Caroline isn't 1-5(I think that's what KC is)

And please, people need to quit using the Steelers as a bar for anything!!!

And I don't disagree with anything you said about Peter King, the guys a toad, but WHY WHY WHY must we have so many threads where a writer picks against us or says something negative about us, then use up three pages talking about what an a**h*** the guy is.

The facts still remain that Cincy hasn't even really looked good in ONE SINGLE GAME. So, tell me why any "normal football fan" with or without a column would bet on us right now?

Now excuse me while I find a very large man to beat the hell out of me because I defended Peter King and i somehow feel like I need punished for doing it

[Dan2330]

F him and he can take that ass monkey Hammerin Hank with him. Why do they even give these guys air time, I believe Hammerin was like 0-6 two weeks ago.. a monkey throwing darts can pick better games then these two fools