nechemia Posted April 30, 2006 Report Posted April 30, 2006 how painful is it that the Cowboys took Fasano 2 picks ahead of when we took the 100th tackle that will now be on the roster. I mean don't they f-ing already have Witten, who ironically is the TE many wish we would have taken in the 3rd round 3 years ago instead of KW...guess both teams used the same logic or lack thereof...sucks Quote
BigBenBlows Posted April 30, 2006 Report Posted April 30, 2006 Maybe the Cowboys want to cut Whitten. Thats why they drafted Fasano ahead of us and we can pick up Whitten on the FA market. Yeah F-in right. Quote
derekshank Posted April 30, 2006 Report Posted April 30, 2006 How about the Rams drafting 2 TE's in the first day... and they already re-signed Manumalena in the offseason! Sounds like they are going to run the goalline offense all season long. Quote
BlainThePain Posted May 1, 2006 Report Posted May 1, 2006 I don't think we would have drafted Fasano, anyway. On bengals.com either Marvin Lewis or Paul Alexander said the Bengals had Whitworth rated as a first rounder and was leaps and bounds ahead of who was left on the board. Quote
San Antonio Bengal Posted May 1, 2006 Report Posted May 1, 2006 how painful is it that the Cowboys took Fasano 2 picks ahead of when we took the 100th tackle that will now be on the roster. I mean don't they f-ing already have Witten, who ironically is the TE many wish we would have taken in the 3rd round 3 years ago instead of KW...guess both teams used the same logic or lack thereof...sucksIt's not painful at all because the Bengals wouldn't have taken Fasano anyway. Even though I said it in another thread, I'll say it again here -- the Cowboys are going to start using a two TE offense. That's why they took Fasano even though they already have Witten. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.