ntpou Posted March 17, 2004 Report Posted March 17, 2004 Its all coming together now. We are getting a DT & CB the only ? is.Is it W.Sapp & C.Gamble or B.Taylor & R.StarksWhich one would you rather have.My vote is Sapp and Gamble Quote
Kirkendall Posted March 17, 2004 Report Posted March 17, 2004 Its all coming together now. We are getting a DT & CB the only ? is.Is it W.Sapp & C.Gamble or B.Taylor & R.StarksWhich one would you rather have.My vote is Sapp and Gamble Either, both scenarios are way better than what we have now, eh? Quote
chrishcovga Posted March 17, 2004 Report Posted March 17, 2004 I think we still go by the concept that best improves our team. Sure we could sign both Sapp and Taylor, but keeping the Defensive line fresh and rotating is a Marvin Lewis Niche.So if Wilfork or Starks were available I'd still take Wilfork to have a great 3 man rotation up front. We'd go from 25th against the run to about 6th just from the depth . and We could still land a guy like Derrick STrait in round 2, since he's slipping from his 4.55 workout. Quote
ntpou Posted March 17, 2004 Author Report Posted March 17, 2004 I would love to have T.Harris , Wolfolk or Udez to go along we Sapp. But I don't think they will be available. Quote
Bobcat Bengal Posted March 17, 2004 Report Posted March 17, 2004 R.StarksWhich one would you rather have.My vote is Sapp and Gamble I concur. Quote
Bengals44 Posted March 17, 2004 Report Posted March 17, 2004 I dont care who we sign as a FA - if Wolfolk is there when we draft we cannot pass on that... I do not think he will be available however... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.